SOPHEON PLC
No acquisitions; all organic growth.
Looks like a very solid set of results.
SOPHEON PLC
No acquisitions; all organic growth.
Looks like a very solid set of results.
17,172
74% of revenue from US; 26% Europe.
Potential to expand globally into Asia
10,061
Decent cash balance
9,696
Relatively high - ~40% of rev
in line with management's expectations.
Useless statement - it's market expectations that matter...
This is complete gobbledegook! You don't write-off goodwill and other assets "to support future trading", you do it because the auditors have insisted on it!
Hahaha, rant
I'm increasingly of the view that searching for the lowest PER, highest yielding companies, is a dangerous strategy which, more often that not, will land you in a mess. Fairpoint (LON:FRP) was a good recent example, and DX is another.
This is a really interesting comment
the Company continued to invest in effective marketing, holding the acquisition cost per client flat, and keeping the average client payback period at around four months.
Four months payback is impressive - that's lots of losing trades!!
The second quarter was positively impacted by the market volatility surrounding the US Presidential election in November. Revenue in the second quarter reached a record level of £133.4 million, 23% ahead of the prior year period.
Thought this would be the case. Why then are they behind target for H1?
Operating expenses rose by 23%, with more than half of the absolute rise due to an increased marketing investment, where the payback remains compelling.
High spend on marketing - "compelling" results of this... hmm
22.55
Expectation is 46.7m - again slightly behind track
105.2
Full year expectation in £217m - therefore, slightly behind track. A little concerning since Trump volatility should have made increased H1 profits
£94.9m £118.2m
Key figure here is a 20% reduction in non-adjusted PBT; even though they are quoting 1double digit increase in EPS.
in line with management expectations
We don't care about management expectations! Must compare to market expectations.
underwriting contribution for the year is likely to be lower than our prior expectations.
Profit warning.
due entirely to development timings and, given recent trading, the Board remains confident of meeting current market expectations for reported profits in the year to 31 March 2017
Blames timing entirely for the reduction
245,581
Significant reduction in revenue
Mixed bag. Live events revenues increasing; print advertising decreasing.
Need to review segment analysis of earnings.
Adj. target PBT was £7.7bn; nowhere near with £6.6bn
Not yet in profit Not keen on the name of this Jam tomorrow?
Bullish statement, need to check net debt.
This process has now completed, with the IP transferred to a new, independently funded vehicle, called Pimloc, in exchange for a 25% stake in the new company.
So we've basically lost 75% of the IP from our investment? Seems dodgy, was this correctly reported previously?
Profit before taxation 42,403
Expectation is 45.7; price should drop?
No mention in the summary that they've made an £11.7m loss!
Adjusted profit before tax (£m) 31.3
Huge difference in the adjusted figures - almost doubles profits. Why is this?
early planning assumption suggests Consumer Electronics volumes will be significantly lower in 2017
Worrying statement, is this really the case?
Need to see how this looks this morning and review the take up of Open offer
Target is 8.6m for the year; only achieved 2.5 for the first half.
his makes me wonder whether Govt policy to force 1% p.a. rent reductions is a wise thing? The law of unintended consequences seems to have kicked in. To recoup the 1% rent foregone, social landlords are clearly cutting back, and deferring maintenance & repairs. That in turn is triggering profit warnings from contractors like Lakehouse & Mitie, who then lay off staff in order to balance their own books. The Govt then collects in less NI/income tax, and has to pay out dole money to the people laid off. Plus, properties become more dilapidated, and eventual repair bills might become higher, if preventative maintenance is delayed too long. It would be interesting to do a cost/benefit analysis here, which I suspect overall might show that the 1% rent cuts could be counter-productive?
Great point
Hit its target of 16m adjusted profit for the year
Down 14% on the day
Adjusted profit before tax[5] £3.9m
Target is 10m for the full year, so behind schedule. Last year they made 5m and were over 50% at half way mark
Risk of going bust and earnings manipulation is too high
In-line with expectations.<br> Debt relatively high Price probably about right at the moment
that all of this growth is organic
no acquisitions
increase its underlying profit before tax1 by c.19%.
Analysts estimated a 41% increase; not 19%. Share Price has been hammered as a result.
There has been evidence of some weakness in the secondary housing market since our trading update on 29 June. Whilst website enquiries have increased, and we have continued to take new reservations, these have been at a lower level than we saw in the first nine months of the financial year and cancellations have been at higher levels.
Bearish comment - concerns over future profits
The new financial year has started well with performance in this short period since the year end being ahead of our expectations and the corresponding period last year. Volumes are increasing through a combination of new business wins and existing customer growth. These developments, together with the combination of our recent strategic acquisition, organic growth and further planned improvements in operational and administrative efficiency, continues to give the Board encouragement for the future.
Very bullish statement
34,627
Bang on analysts target
the danger is that such low interest rates may cause hire companies to over-invest, resulting in over-supply of hire equipment, and eventually a plunge in profits when the next recession coincides with over-supply.
Good risk
Solid set of results. Meeting expectations; 10% increase in profits.
Net debt starting to get a little high, but I think this is fairly normal for a rental company
profits increased by 22% to £10.1 million (2015: £8.3 million).
Although on 45% of revenues, most profit comes from the UK
underlying operating profits declining to £1.7 million (2015: £2.2 million).
Not much money from continental Europe
UK (45% of Group Rental Revenues)
Potential resilience to Brexit economy impact
The Group's net debt before issue costs at 30 June 2016 was £149.7 million (31 December 2015: £119.9 million).
Debt is getting too high for my liking
an adverse foreign exchange movement of £11.0 million as a result of the sharp deterioration in Sterling's value against the Euro and US Dollar at the period end (following the UK's vote to leave the European Union (EU)).
Not good, significant amount
The Board has declared an interim dividend of 2.00 pence per share, an increase of 18% over the previous year (2015: 1.70 pence per share). This will be paid on 7 October 2016 to shareholders on the register at 9 September 2016.
Progressive dividend policy
diversified business model
Any overseas income?
extremely strong cash flow in the period where net debt has reduced from £161.7 million at the start of the year to £74.9 million at the half year, a significant drop of £86.8 million.
Cash generative business which is great
The parts division has also performed well."
Why are they disposing of this then; or is this just a statement to keep the buyer interested?
*Adjusted profit before tax increased 16% to £50.1 million (2015: £43.1 million)
Full year projected adj PBT is 80m; therefore, already over half way there
Projected profits and EPS in decline; priced at 10x PBT+2 - too expensive
Tiny - 2.8m market cap
Currently priced about right - only small projected growth
Trading in London continued to show a downturn and consequently London suffered a significant loss.
Terrible statement
Tiny only 1.9m market cap
Tiny only 1.9m market cap
AEC Education Plc
Tiny only 1.9m market cap
During the reporting period, five stores were opened and eighteen were closed, reducing total selling space by 4.2% to 729,000 square feet.
Unlikely to result in profit growth
In a time of uncertainty for retail and the global economy at large, I am optimistic and confident that Laura Ashley will remain a business with solid foundations to withstand challenges as they arise."
Not that bullish