60 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2017
  2. Feb 2017
    1. This is complete gobbledegook! You don't write-off goodwill and other assets "to support future trading", you do it because the auditors have insisted on it!

      Hahaha, rant

    2. I'm increasingly of the view that searching for the lowest PER, highest yielding companies, is a dangerous strategy which, more often that not, will land you in a mess. Fairpoint (LON:FRP) was a good recent example, and DX is another.

      This is a really interesting comment

  3. Jan 2017
    1. the Company continued to invest in effective marketing, holding the acquisition cost per client flat, and keeping the average client payback period at around four months.

      Four months payback is impressive - that's lots of losing trades!!

    2. The second quarter was positively impacted by the market volatility surrounding the US Presidential election in November.  Revenue in the second quarter reached a record level of £133.4 million, 23% ahead of the prior year period.

      Thought this would be the case. Why then are they behind target for H1?

    3. Operating expenses rose by 23%, with more than half of the absolute rise due to an increased marketing investment, where the payback remains compelling. 

      High spend on marketing - "compelling" results of this... hmm

    4. 105.2

      Full year expectation in £217m - therefore, slightly behind track. A little concerning since Trump volatility should have made increased H1 profits

  4. Dec 2016
  5. Nov 2016
    1. due entirely to development timings and, given recent trading, the Board remains confident of meeting current market expectations for reported profits in the year to 31 March 2017

      Blames timing entirely for the reduction

  6. Oct 2016
    1. This process has now completed, with the IP transferred to a new, independently funded vehicle, called Pimloc, in exchange for a 25% stake in the new company.

      So we've basically lost 75% of the IP from our investment? Seems dodgy, was this correctly reported previously?

    1. early planning assumption suggests Consumer Electronics volumes will be significantly lower in 2017

      Worrying statement, is this really the case?

  7. Sep 2016
    1. his makes me wonder whether Govt policy to force 1% p.a. rent reductions is a wise thing? The law of unintended consequences seems to have kicked in. To recoup the 1% rent foregone, social landlords are clearly cutting back, and deferring maintenance & repairs. That in turn is triggering profit warnings from contractors like Lakehouse & Mitie, who then lay off staff in order to balance their own books. The Govt then collects in less NI/income tax, and has to pay out dole money to the people laid off. Plus, properties become more dilapidated, and eventual repair bills might become higher, if preventative maintenance is delayed too long. It would be interesting to do a cost/benefit analysis here, which I suspect overall might show that the 1% rent cuts could be counter-productive?

      Great point

    1. Adjusted profit before tax[5]  £3.9m

      Target is 10m for the full year, so behind schedule. Last year they made 5m and were over 50% at half way mark

    1. increase its underlying profit before tax1 by c.19%.

      Analysts estimated a 41% increase; not 19%. Share Price has been hammered as a result.

    2. There has been evidence of some weakness in the secondary housing market since our trading update on 29 June.  Whilst website enquiries have increased, and we have continued to take new reservations, these have been at a lower level than we saw in the first nine months of the financial year and cancellations have been at higher levels.

      Bearish comment - concerns over future profits

    1. The new financial year has started well with performance in this short period since the year end being  ahead of our expectations and the corresponding period last year. Volumes are increasing through a combination of new business wins and existing customer growth. These developments, together with the combination of our recent strategic acquisition, organic growth and further planned improvements in operational and administrative efficiency, continues to give the Board encouragement for the future.

      Very bullish statement

  8. Aug 2016
    1. the danger is that such low interest rates may cause hire companies to over-invest, resulting in over-supply of hire equipment, and eventually a plunge in profits when the next recession coincides with over-supply.

      Good risk

    1. Solid set of results. Meeting expectations; 10% increase in profits.

      Net debt starting to get a little high, but I think this is fairly normal for a rental company

    2. The Group's net debt before issue costs at 30 June 2016 was £149.7 million (31 December 2015: £119.9 million).

      Debt is getting too high for my liking

    3. an adverse foreign exchange movement of £11.0 million as a result of the sharp deterioration in Sterling's value against the Euro and US Dollar at the period end (following the UK's vote to leave the European Union (EU)).

      Not good, significant amount

    4. The Board has declared an interim dividend of 2.00 pence per share, an increase of 18% over the previous year (2015: 1.70 pence per share). This will be paid on 7 October 2016 to shareholders on the register at 9 September 2016.

      Progressive dividend policy

    1. extremely strong cash flow in the period where net debt has reduced from £161.7 million at the start of the year to £74.9 million at the half year, a significant drop of £86.8 million.

      Cash generative business which is great

    2. The parts division has also performed well."

      Why are they disposing of this then; or is this just a statement to keep the buyer interested?

    3. *Adjusted profit before tax increased 16% to £50.1 million (2015: £43.1 million)

      Full year projected adj PBT is 80m; therefore, already over half way there

    1. During the reporting period, five stores were opened and eighteen were closed, reducing total selling space by 4.2% to 729,000 square feet.

      Unlikely to result in profit growth

    2. In a time of uncertainty for retail and the global economy at large, I am optimistic and confident that Laura Ashley will remain a business with solid foundations to withstand challenges as they arise."

      Not that bullish