Social media has a huge influence on society; bot activity and design decisions may have a big impact on how social movements spread or are suppressed, which frequently polarizes public opinion. These platforms' operations and policies are shaped by a variety of influences, such as governmental, societal, and economic ones. Comprehending this intricate interaction is essential for conscientious use of social media and acknowledging its influence on social dynamics.

Understanding the workings of social media is essential for users since the way material is tailored by algorithms may have a big influence on your mood and mental health. Online safety and privacy depend on you being aware of how these sites use or could exploit your data. Furthermore, accessing social media platforms properly and securely requires understanding other people's techniques as well as how spam bots and harassment methods operate.

The essay examines the moral ramifications of the tech sector's reliance on cheap labor in nations with laxer laws, stressing not just the dangers to one's health from producing and handling hazardous materials but also the emotional toll it takes on individuals entrusted with filtering objectionable content online. It highlights a structural problem in which governance flaws and economic inequalities are taken advantage of, frequently at the expense of people's dignity and well-being.

The basic ideas of a capitalist economy, in which private property and unrestricted market competition propel economic activity, are discussed in this work. It emphasizes how important it is for both corporate and individual decision-makers to shape the investment environment and decide how best to allocate resources.

The basic ideas of a capitalist economy, in which private property and unrestricted market competition propel economic activity, are discussed in this work. It emphasizes how important it is for both corporate and individual decision-makers to shape the investment environment and decide how best to allocate resources.

It insightfully captures the evolution of celebrity culture in the age of social media, as highlighted by Bo Burnham's observations. It underscores how social platforms have expanded the concept of celebrity, distributing its pressures and dynamics to a wider audience. This democratization of celebrity emphasizes the growing tension between public personas and private selves, a phenomenon increasingly relevant in today's digital society.

It highlights an important aspect of parenting: addressing negative or dangerous behavior in a way that separates the child's actions from their identity. It underscores the role of parents in helping children understand the difference between feeling guilty about a specific action and feeling shame about themselves as a person. This approach fosters a healthier emotional development where children learn accountability and the importance of repairing relationships, rather than hiding from their mistakes.

The text insightfully distinguishes between the typical connotations of 'violence' and 'authenticity,' highlighting how societal perceptions often shape our understanding of these terms. It points out that while 'violence' usually carries negative connotations, certain actions, like a doctor setting a bone, though violent in nature, are not labeled as such due to their legitimate and beneficial context. This analysis underscores the complexity of language and how moral judgments can influence the categorization of actions in societal discourse.

The social media makes individual harassment easier, and them might increase the number of harassment. However, because of the situation, a healthy social media environment should be made by constructing some user laws.

It is good that by the Mechanical Turk can improve and do work based on the previous one from other workers, which may cost less time and can continue to make progress. However, the worker may not recognize and do not comprehend the previous work because of objective or subjective reasons (e.g. the undecipherable handwriting is one of the reasons) which might further decrease the efficiency.

I am an international student, so my parents and I are in different countries with time difference. In the past, we often sit at the dinner table to share the life with each other. However, we can just chat on social media platforms - the main communication method.

It highlights the contrasting approaches of different governments to content moderation and censorship. It underscores the strict laws in the US against materials like CSAM, and contrasts them with China's broader censorship practices, including manipulating social media platforms to suppress news about protests.

I think considering different platforms is important. Linking to Public Relations, different platforms have different audiences and we should be aware of our publics and their needs. Managing different platforms is different - we should adjust.

When people sitting in a static motion for long time looking at the screen, there might be physical negative results. Also, worries cannot be diminished by spending a lot of time to entertain. However, there might be more concerns as the person do not finish and spend efforts on work/study. Healthily accessing to the technology is preferred and a good way to relax and follow the news.

It is true and I have similar experience. When I spent time, browsing the social media platforms, the time is extremely "faster" as I imagine. It is also the reason why some people spend "their whole life" on internet. I think to reasonably balance our leisure time and work/study, we should set the time for entertaining at first and stop to study/work at that settled time.

Social media platforms frequently result in repeated reinterpretations of information because they allow users to add their own opinions and create a dynamic, multi-layered discourse. Examples of these tools are quote tweets and responses. This social media feature not only makes it easier for information to circulate widely, but it also highlights how digital communication is always changing and that each contact can somewhat change the original context or meaning of a message. Because of this, a single post may inspire a wide range of storylines, with each version capturing the unique characteristics of the person who altered it and enhancing the post's viral potential.

This claim emphasizes the viral quality of social media material and shows how dissemination—whether unaltered or altered—increases exposure within user networks. The notion of "inheritance" in content replication emphasizes how changes are ever-lasting; once an edit is made, it is applied consistently to all ensuing shares, possibly changing the original meaning or purpose of the information. The phrase encapsulates a basic feature of digital information dissemination: material changes as it circulates, frequently creating an intricate network of original and modified copies that are viewed by an ever-expanding viewership.

I actually have experience and feelings about this. It is true that the algorithms let me add or follow friends more conveniently for example at Instagram. I can follow some people in the same college of we share many common followers. However, I have another account which I just want to share some personal feelings (only let close friends follow). When some people I know but not that familiar request to follow this account, I feel a bit weird but not allowing the request seems weird, too.

If the creators do not have the negative purpose, it also may produce biased, unfair, or unethical outcomes. Therefore, it is a bit difficult to decide the responsibility as the intention can not be decided according to the results. It is not a simple question. However, it is reasonable to be not completely accurate as people's preference is changing all the time and is affected by various factors - it is subjective. Algorithms is just something created to predict from your previous activities, so it is not a human, even your close friends or family cannot predict completely true.

It is how technology and society can do for the disabled people to have same or at least similar access as other people. However, there are still limitations. These kinds of technologies or tools usually cost relatively high prices, and some disabled people can not afford them, and therefore they will still lose chance to access information. I think we should keep develop to have other methods making more people who are able to be involved.

Although it is reasonable that people with disabilities may actively find ways to cope with their disability, the society should be aware of the problem and well-rounded to include facilities that can help these people. Also, when we coding, we should make sure that information can also be delievered to these kinds of people, making sure they have the same or at least similar chances as other people.

It emphasizes important distinctions between the notions of digital privacy and hacking, pointing out that unclear or misinterpreted privacy regulations can also lead to privacy breaches. The examples show how users' perceptions of what is "private" in digital communications, such as direct messages, can be seen by employers, platform owners, or system administrators, perhaps without the users' knowledge or agreement. The potential scenario of Elon Musk buying Twitter serves as a stark reminder that ownership of a digital platform entails access to all user data, including private conversations. This scenario emphasizes the significance of open privacy policies and user consent in data access.

The essay emphasizes the ethical need of natural rights, which essentially encompass privacy, and the crucial role that legal frameworks play in protecting individual private. The GDPR highlights the growing acceptance of personal data autonomy by noting people's "right to be forgotten," which gives them authority over their digital imprint. Moreover, the mention of the position taken by the US Supreme Court suggests that privacy may be seen as an inherent constitutional right, independent of legislative safeguards, which underscores its basic importance in contemporary legal systems and governance.

It emphasizes how user interaction generates profit and influence, which is at the heart of social media business models. It emphasizes the relationship between more screen time and more advertising money for platforms, which gives them more power over how users behave and pay attention. Because of this cycle, social media businesses are always refining their data analytics, which enables them to improve user experiences and increase "stickiness," or the likelihood that users will return to their platforms, thus continuing the engagement and revenue cycle.

The social media and many other websites can track users' data and use the big data and information collected to recommend relevant ads or products to them. However, they may use this information not only to achieve simple commercial aims, but possibly be some other purposes which may threaten the users' safety. Thus, I think some regulations should be made and the companies should be aware and take the responsibility. If their users find that they use their information to do some unethical thing, they may be upset and they may not trust the company in the future - leading to long-term loss.

K-pop fans' initiative during the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations exemplifies a distinct type of digital activism in which the general public can undermine surveillance techniques for social justice goals. They successfully protected demonstrators from extra inspection by oversaturating the Dallas Police app with irrelevant content, turning the tables on a system intended to track and manage civil disobedience. This instance highlights how protest in the digital age is changing, showing how online groups can organize to defend civil liberties in creative and unanticipated ways.

An upsetting misuse of digital platforms is the exploitation of Matthew Kocher's memorial website, which transforms a place of grieving into one of callousness and cruelty. The act of making fun of a tragic drowning with such cruel imagery is extremely disrespectful to the victim's memory and causes unneeded suffering for the victim's loved ones. This incident highlights the critical requirement for stricter moderation procedures on social media platforms in order to safeguard grieving communities from offensive information and uphold the sacredness of memorial places.

When multiple social circles collide, it can be difficult to decide which character to project, which is reflected in the phenomena of "context collapse," which is especially common in social media. This mental balancing effort, which was formerly restricted to physical settings like unexpectedly running into one's parents while out with friends, has become considerably more difficult in the digital world where several social groupings cohabit. As people strive to balance a one-size-fits-all method of communication with diverse social expectations and relationships, the hazy boundaries between private and public sharing can cause anxiety and self-censorship.

We value authenticity because it protects us from potential dangers and emotional uncertainty in our social relationships and satisfies our innate need for security and sincere connections. Authentic people establish a sense of reliability and stability in their interactions, establishing secure environments where vulnerability is appreciated rather than taken advantage of. By strengthening our social links through the honest and open sharing of our genuine selves, we are better equipped to deal with the complexities of human emotions and societal pressures.

I think I may restrict directly copying from others' post or text, commenting impolitely to others, and posting words that threat the society rights. These are posts that might lead to serious consequences, so to make the social media site safer and green, we should make some limitations.

Nowadays, the social media platforms are developed and make it easier for people to interact with each other. It is beneficial but also may bring some threats. People can have access to more information and communicate more efficiently through social media. However, there might be safety and privacy issues: the website or platforms may record personal information from their users.

The text delves into the concept of consequentialism, particularly its subset, utilitarianism, which emphasizes actions that maximize happiness and well-being for the majority. The term 'utility calculus' refers to the analytical process of weighing probable outcomes to determine the best course of action based on overall happiness and well-being.

The text highlights the inherent limitations of data as a representation of the complex real world and underscores the implications of design choices in social media systems. These choices can inadvertently prioritize certain user experiences, potentially marginalizing others and compelling them to adapt or misrepresent themselves.

I think people have higher expectations for a bot than a "normal" user. People recognize that it is generated by AI, and they may not know AI very well - just thinking it is amazing. They will allow mistakes or misinformation posted by normal users but maybe not for a bot. As a result, they may pay more attention to it and have higher expectations.

I think that the between the people who typed the codes and the people who run the codes, the creator should take the responsibilities. If the creators do not come up with the codes, the results will not be there. I think to be responsible, the creators should imagine all of the results (positive and negative) before actually create. They should be comprehensively considered.

I relatively agree with this opinion. People actually pretend to be "perfect" on social media, and they post photos or videos to demonstrate an image that they want others regard them as. However, it might be different from what they actually are. Even when texting, people tend to be polite and kind especially when text to someone they are not very familiar with. For example, before I posting photos to my Wechat moment, I will PS and check I am satisfied with all of the photos. However, my skin may not be so smooth with acnes.

"Zhuzibaijia - hundred schools of thought" is the general term for various academic sects in the pre-Qin period. According to records, there are 189 named authors with 4,324 works. Later, it was also recorded that there were actually thousands of "hundred schools of thought". However, there are only a few dozen of them that are widely spread, have greater influence, and are the most famous. In summary, only 12 schools were developed. Besides, Confucianism and Taoism, there are several main ones: Legalist, Mohist, military strategist, etc.