14 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Sign the manifesto

      much more accessible

    2. If Ukrainian society lays down its arms, there will be no Ukrainian society. If Russia lays down its arms, the war will end.

      commonly used. real

    3. - cancellation of Ukraine's foreign debt (and that of other countries of the global periphery) for post-war reconstruction and prevention of further austerity policies;

      they are also agreeing here but its not the only point, as in the other reading

    4. a just peace,

      does just peace suffice as an explanation?

    5. a vulnerable position due to barriers to housing, social infrastructure, stable income, and medical services (including contraception and abortion)

      intersectionality yes

    6. gender-based violence

      another connection to the feminist struggle.

    7. We insist on the essential difference between violence as a means of oppression and as a legitimate means of self-defense.

      violence as a means of feminism,,,, tbh i would like a little more elaboration on this and how violent resistance is justified for the nay-sayers

    8. struggle both during war and in peacetime.

      a direct answer. peace is not it.

    9. Ukrainian feminists were struggling against systemic discrimination, patriarchy, racism, and capitalist exploitation long before the present moment.

      stopping the war isnt going to solve the feminist struggle

    10. feminist solidarity as a political practice which must listen to the voices of those directly affected by imperialist aggression

      again, an explanation of solidarity and its place in political practice and its place in the resistance, not so saviourist

    11. War narratives often portray women* as victims. However, in reality, women* also play a key role in resistance movements, both at the frontline and on the home front: from Algeria to Vietnam, from Syria to Palestine, from Kurdistan to Ukraine.

      Intersectionality and an explanation of feminisms intersection to resistance.

    1. WE ARE MANY WHO SAY NO TO WAR, IMPERIALISM, PATRIARCHY, AUTHORITARIANISM AND MILITARISM.

      Saying no, voicing dissent in this case seems like the primary goal of this manifesto. How does voicing dissent via this route prevail over for example direct action / protesting / demos.

    2. There is no greater security than peace.

      how do we fight back with peace?

    3. We reject the decisions

      I wonder who is making these decisions, then they answer it beneath