9 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. Within these shared parameters, however, Singh gives us photographs charged with life: not only beautiful experiences or painful scenes but also those in-between moments of drift that make up most of our days. Singh had a democratic eye, and he took pictures of everything: cities, towns, villages, shops, rivers, worshipers, workers, construction sites, motorbikes, statues, modern furniture, balconies, suits, dresses and, sure, turbans and saris.

      Photographs of everyday life amidst the good and the bad I like how the author wrote "democratic eye" to describe Singh's more open perspective (and contrasts with the intro paragraph's photographer)

    2. The problem is that the uniqueness of any given country is a mixture not only of its indigenous practices and borrowed customs but also of its past and its present.

      Countries are stuck between the old and the new (Technology co-exists with traditional architecture) Time doesn't mean nothing will change, and it doesn't mean everything will change

    3. he photographs in "India," all taken in the last 40 years, are popular in part because they evoke an earlier time in Indian history, as well as old ideas of what photographs of Indians should look like, what the accouterments of their lives should be: umbrellas, looms, sewing machines; not laptops, wireless printers, escalators.

      Photographs that don't present India as it completely is ("should be" enforces a certain perspective/point of view)

    1. Right now, I could name at least ten ideas I would have found intolerable or incomprehensible and frightening, except as they came after dreams and poems. This is not idle fantasy, but a disciplined attention to the true meaning of"it feels right to me."

      The feelings and ideas came after poems as in they were easier to digest interpreted as poems or required writing poetry to be fully understood?

    2. For women, then, poetry is not a luxury. It is a vital necessity of our existence. It forms the quality of the light within which we predicate our hopes and dreams toward survival and change, first made into language, then into idea, then into more tangible action.

      Reference to the title aka main idea of the entire piece Reminds me of Sylvia Plath's poetry

    1. Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be.

      like seeing a famous painting on a postcard without knowing why its famous or impactful enough to get on to a postcard

      Emphasizes how a reproduction will never be the same as the original (on the side of not reproducing or at least on the side of original, authentic art)

      • even though authenticity is hard to figure out
    2. ll legends, all mythologies and all myths, all founders of religion, and the very religions ... await their exposed resurrection,

      I find this very interesting because so many stories have been recreated and trends cycle a lot so this technique has probably become even more popular now Reminds me of Disney live action remakes which hasn't been able to resurrect any of the same feelings they did before

    3. The uniqueness of a work of art is inseparable from its being imbedded in the fabric of tradition. This tradition itself is thoroughly alive and extremely changeable.

      Works of art can't be separated from its context, but context can be viewed differently