There was no difference in ethanol preference between these two cohorts (fig. S3A). There was also no difference between males exposed individually to biologically relevant concentrations of cVA (13) and vehicle-exposed controls (fig. S3B) (11).
The researchers found that both males exposed to mated females (and by extension cVA) as well as males exposed to decapitated virgin females (who lacked cVA) demonstrated a preference for alcohol. To confirm this finding, they also simply exposed a third group of males to the chemical by itself without a female present before testing their preference for alcohol. This third group too maintained a preference for alcohol. Based on this, they concluded that cVA could not be the driving cause for the observed alcohol preference, and that the effect was likely due to the actual sexual deprivation involved.