8 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2016
    1. The definition of blended learning is a formal education program in which a student learns: (1) at least in part through online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path, and/or pace; (2) at least in part in a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home; (3) and the modalities along each student’s learning path within a course or subject are connected to provide an integrated learning experience. The majority of blended-learning programs resemble one of four models: Rotation, Flex, A La Carte, and Enriched Virtual. The Rotation model includes four sub-models: Station Rotation, Lab Rotation, Flipped Classroom, and Individual Rotation.

      How does this definition of Blended Learning fit our work? Is it missing or marginalizing anything that is important?

    1. 1.  EVERY SCHOOL NEEDS A VISION.

      This is just the first of the four essential principles of BL. The other three are:

      1. One size does not fit all.
      2. Don't let software dictate learning goals.
      3. Support teachers and include them in decision-making process.

      What do you think?

    1. I’ve quickly become overwhelmed by the flood of acronyms — and more and more convinced that they are being tossed around without much consensus about what they mean in terms of course structure and instructional quality. Saying that your course utilizes blended learning may elicit approving nods, but structure does not strong pedagogy magically make. I think that it is important for us as educators to remember that it is our job to mix and match and pick and choose from the tools available and make them work to meet the needs of the students in front of us. As I’ve oft repeated in my posts, it is fundamentally human, relational work (with tech assistance).

      Does blended learning mean entirely different things to different educators? Does that matter? What do you think about Nicole's reflection here?

    1. A teacher who made a successful foray into blended learning shares five helpful tips for exploring the process. For the past several months, teachers have regularly posted cries for help like this one on my blog: "My school is transitioning to the Common Core State Standards, and teachers are being asked to integrate technology. I'm overwhelmed by the prospect!" Many of these pleas come from veteran teachers with years of classroom experience.

      This teacher author uses the Clayton Christiansen Institute's definition of blended learning in a technology integration model that seems typical in our work and thoughtful. Is she stretching the definition?

    1. I want to reiterate that I don't like restricting access and I definitely don't like the idea of blocking YouTube.

      I hope we can identify a few things to try and then look to effectively partner with the IT department to test solutions. When we have variables to tinker with like search restrictions, Google domain management tools, and school-level blocks, we ought to be able to work toward a more palatable view of access.

    2. Since I am unfamiliar with what the Google admin panel allows in the way of customization, I don't really have a ready-made solution to propose, but I do feel strongly that we have to do something or we risk principals and teachers refusing to use the chromebooks in all of the powerful ways they can be used.

      I think this is a place where we should identify our ability to test and experiment with solutions. For example, could we whitelist content providers on YouTube? Are there other school districts who use their admin panel effectively to restrict access to mature content?

    3. Lansing has had three instances of students watching porn and A Hills is having trouble with 7th grade boys doing the same, so we did a quick little test.

      I think these types of issues require us to help our schools develop workable solutions. Is it important/helpful that schools can block YouTube for just their sites?

    4. I know that IT turned off restrictions because what they restricted were so hit and miss; our screencasts got censured while near naked women running on the beach in slow motion were the top hit on a seemingly innocuous search. That said, we’ve got to get with IT and figure something out

      This is important to me because you've identified an important inquiry question: How might we establish restrictions that effectively limit access to mature content on our network?