7 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2024
    1. “I feel comfortable that alcohol and guns shouldn’t mix,” he said.

      He can "feel comfortable" all he wants, but his feelings are where the subject ends.

      Simply having opinions does not grant anyone authority to impose those opinions on others - especially when one is of the tyrannical opinion that engaging in an activity that one disapproves of is enough to deprive that person of the human right to self-defense outright.

    2. It’s a reasonable rule

      It is not reasonable that a person should surrender their right to effective self-defense simply because they are drinking.

    3. He said the nation’s founders absolutely recognized the commonsense notion that guns and booze are a dangerous combination.

      ...he asserted without evidence, and the obviously biased reporter just let that slide.

    4. pro-gun laws

      There are no "pro-gun laws". There is only the right to keep and bear arms, and infringements against that natural state.

      Since nature is pro-gun, the only laws that exist infringe on that, so all gun laws are anti-gun laws.

    5. limitations

      Jake misspelled "infringements" here.

    6. they established a right

      Rights aren't established by men, they are inherent, especially within the sphere of US law. Start by reading "The Declaration of Independence" that "holds these truths as self-evident".

    7. perceived self-defense

      Also known as "self-defense".