• Answer

  • No.
  • we end up with a non conceptual insight that:
    • we can then communicate
    • that we can discuss
    • that we can articulate
    • that requires that reason be present at:
      • the beginning like the seed
      • in the middle when we're performing the analysis
      • like the rain that nourishes the crops and
      • in the end in the harvest
    • because non conceptuality is really easy to achieve all you need is a very large rock,
      • just bang right on your head and non conceptuality is there
    • but that's a mute inert non-conceptual
    • Non-conceptuality needs to be enriched by the conceptual insight that allows you to actually make something of it

• The Middle Way

  • using the conceptual to reach a deeper appreciation of the state of non-conceptuality,
  • in other words, using dualistic thought and language to reach insights about the nondual

• Title
  • Madhyamaka: Jay Garfield
• Description
  • Jay Garfield talks about why Nagarjuna's technique employts reason to undermine itself to achieve peace in a nonconceptual state.
    • He humorously points out how its easy to achieve nonconceptual states in many ways, such as a large rock to the head, but that kind of nonconceptual state is not really insightful for penetrating the deep philosophical questions we all have.
    • He clarifies why Nagarjuna's process is called the Middle Way,
      • it employs (conceptual) analysis to achieve wisdom of the nondual (nonconceptual) state

Title: http://www.judithragir.org/2017/08/dogen-nagarjunas-tetralemma-6/ Author: Judith Ragir Date: 2017

Title: THE LOGIC OF THE CATUSKOTI Author: GRAHAM PRIEST Year: 2010

Title: What is Real? Nagarjuna's Middle Way A Discussion with Barry Kerzin (Doctor to HH Dalai Lama, Professor and Buddhist Monk) and Carlo Rovelli (Quantum Physicist)