for: canonical unit, collaborative commons - missing part - open learning commons, question - process trap - natural capital

comment

• in this context, indyweb and Indranet are not the canonical unit, but then, it seems the model is fundamentally missing the functionality provided but the Indyweb and Indranet, which is and open learning system.
• without such an open learning system that captures the essence of his humans learn, the activity of problem-solving cannot be properly contextualised, along with all of limitations leading to progress traps.
• The entire approach of posing a problem, then solving it is inherently limited due to the fractal intertwingularity of reality.

question: progress trap - natural capital

• It is important to be aware that there is a real potential for a progress trap to emerge here, as any metric is liable to be abused

for: collaborative commons - parts, question - collaborative commons - glue - Indyweb - Indranet, collaborative commons canonical unit - Indyweb - Indranet

parts: collaborative commons

• capital
• metrics - to measure outputs
• cryptocurrency
• governance

question: collaborative commons glue

• Could Indyweb and Indranet be the open source glue that holds the 4 parts of the collaborative commons together?