- Mar 2023
-
royalsocietypublishing.org royalsocietypublishing.org
-
It has been suggested that - the human species may be undergoing an evolutionary transition in individuality (ETI).
there is disagreement about - how to apply the ETI framework to our species - and whether culture is implicated - as either cause or consequence.
Long-term gene–culture coevolution (GCC) i- s - also poorly understood.
argued that - culture steers human evolution,
Others proposed - genes hold culture on a leash.
After review of the literature and evidence on long-term GCC in humans - emerge a set of common themes. - First, culture appears to hold greater adaptive potential than genetic inheritance - and is probably driving human evolution. - The evolutionary impact of culture occurs - mainly through culturally organized groups, - which have come to dominate human affairs in recent millennia. - Second, the role of culture appears to be growing, - increasingly bypassing genetic evolution and weakening genetic adaptive potential. -Taken together, these findings suggest that human long-term GCC is characterized by - an evolutionary transition in inheritance - from genes to culture - which entails a transition in individuality (from genetic individual to cultural group). Research on GCC should focus on the possibility of - an ongoing transition in the human inheritance system.
-
-
www.livescience.com www.livescience.com
-
Here's why: Culture is group-oriented, and people in those groups talk to, learn from and imitate one another. These group behaviors allow people to pass on adaptations they learned through culture faster than genes can transmit similar survival benefits. An individual can learn skills and information from a nearly unlimited number of people in a small amount of time and, in turn, spread that information to many others. And the more people available to learn from, the better. Large groups solve problems faster than smaller groups, and intergroup competition stimulates adaptations that might help those groups survive. As ideas spread, cultures develop new traits.In contrast, a person only inherits genetic information from two parents and racks up relatively few random mutations in their eggs or sperm, which takes about 20 years to be passed on to their small handful of children. That's just a much slower pace of change.
- key observation
- paraphrase
-
why cultural evolution is too fast for genetic evolution
- Culture is group-oriented, and people in those groups talk to, learn from and imitate one another.
- These group behaviors allow people to pass on adaptations they learned through culture faster than genes can transmit similar survival benefits.
- An individual can learn skills and information from a nearly unlimited number of people in a small amount of time
- and, in turn, spread that information to many others.
- And the more people available to learn from, the better.
- Large groups solve problems faster than smaller groups,
- and intergroup competition stimulates adaptations that might help those groups survive.
-
As ideas spread, cultures develop new traits.
-
In contrast, a person only inherits genetic information from two parents
- and racks up relatively few random mutations in their eggs or sperm, which takes about 20 years to be passed on to their small handful of children.
- That's just a much slower pace of change.
-
human culture may be driving evolution faster than genetic mutations can work.
!- key finding - human culture may be driving evolution faster than genetic mutation can work - the major delay, measured in many orders of magnitude - does not allow genetic evolution to adapt quickly enough - to harmful environmental changes brought about through cultural evolution
-
Humans might be making genetic evolution obsolete
- TItle: Humans might be making genetic evolution obsolete
-