One of the most interesting events of the past week, was the holding of what is technically styled a Woman’s Rights Convention, at Seneca Falls.
Please excuse me for saying this but why does there have to have men in attendance since this is a Woman's Rights Convention? Are the men feeling like they are missing something or perhaps a male dominance issue? Was Frederick Dougla.
It is, in their estimation, to be guilty of evil thoughts, to think that woman is entitled to rights equal with man.
Why does there have to be any difference between men and women? I believe that it should be equal rights for all human kind.
Our doctrine is, that “Right is of no sex.” We therefore bid the women engaged in this movement our humble God-speed.
We have come a long way since this Woman's Rights Convention. I thank those woman for being able to voice how they felt and their help in making women on equal ground with men in decision making and politics. This paved the way for women to vote and hold office.
This is a copy of the "AMD" document in the repo, kept here to maintain historical links. If this document differs from the one in the repo, the repo version is the correct one.
Why not just make this document empty (besides a link) and link/redirect to the canonical version?
That way it is impossible for them to disagree.
In the Set class we already called this - and difference, which it is ok but not really accurate because of the previous explanation, but probably not worthwhile to change it.
Is this saying that the name difference is inaccurate?
Why is it inaccurate? You even called it the "theoretic difference" above.
Is that because "relative complement" would be better? Or because the full phrase "theoretic difference" [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/set-theoretic_difference] is required in order for it to be accurate rather than just "difference"?
I cannot help but wonder, would things have been different if Mrs Lee Kuan Yew had continued to attend these meetings?
How do you think Singapore's history might have been different if women were included among the founders of independent Singapore?
Discrimination on the basis of gender or sex is omitted
Can you think of reasons for why this might have been the case?
rimination on the basis of gender or sex is omitted.
Can you think of reasons why this might have been the case?
“Although Mrs Lee Kuan Yew was one of the first women to sign up as a PAP member, she was never admitted into the inner sanctum of the party.Truth be told, she attended the first meeting with S. Rajaratnam, K. M. Byrne, Philip Hoalim Jr and his wife Miki.
Why do you think Mrs Lee Kuan Yew was excluded from the "inner sanctum" of the PAP? Do you think this could have been a justifiable decision in the circumstances?
Was it only by this twist of fate and chance –Lee Kuan Yew wanting to stop the wife of another colleague from attending –that the founding team became and then stayed an All Men’s group?
How do you think Singapore's history might have been different if women were included among the founders of independent Singapore?