- May 2023
-
blog.teknkl.com blog.teknkl.com
-
This doesn't make any sense, though. Once you recognize that the two may represent different addresses, you're arbitrarily choosing the first one in your system as the right one, when the second one is just as right. Just give up at that point and lowercase ’em.
which one should be considered the correct one?
-
- Apr 2023
-
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com softwareengineering.stackexchange.com
-
users/me feels like a bad idea because REST prefers to have one url per resource. You will then have: users/me users/123myId Which point to the same resource.
-
- Nov 2022
-
copyprogramming.com copyprogramming.com
-
Here is a method using the fontTools Python library (which you can install with something like pip install fonttools ):
-
- May 2021
-
litmus.com litmus.com
-
I'd say the author's updated version is canonical: https://hyp.is/2lzvXK4sEeu3s1Piywmzww/www.hteumeuleu.com/2016/using-flexbox-in-an-email/
-
-
www.hteumeuleu.com www.hteumeuleu.com
-
This post was originally published on my blog in french and on the Litmus forums in June 2015. It was updated with information about support in the new Outlook Web App in January 2016.
-
- Apr 2021
-
git.samba.org git.samba.org
-
git.samba.org git.samba.org
-
Was trying to figure out where the canonical repo even is. Hard to figure out. Could be made clearer (like a prominent notice on one saying this is an unofficial clone with a link to the canonical source).
Ended up here via link from https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/86879/suppress-rsync-warning-some-files-vanished-before-they-could-be-transferred to https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=blob_plain;f=support/rsync-no-vanished;hb=HEAD
But then found https://github.com/WayneD/rsync, which I now believe to be canonical based on:
- last change here is Mon, 15 Mar 2021 09:35:39 -0700 (09:35 -0700) but on https://github.com/WayneD/rsync it was April 3.
- https://rsync.samba.org/bug-tracking.html links to: create an issue on GitHub
-
- Mar 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
This is a copy of the "AMD" document in the repo, kept here to maintain historical links. If this document differs from the one in the repo, the repo version is the correct one.
Why not just make this document empty (besides a link) and link/redirect to the canonical version?
That way it is impossible for them to disagree.
Tags
- avoid duplication: impossible for them to disagree/diverge if there's only one version/copy
- make it impossible to get wrong/incorrect
- canonical version
- avoid duplication
- I have a question about this
- maintaining redirect/copy at old URL in order to maintain historical links (broken links)
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.w3.org www.w3.org
-
RDFa is intended to solve the problem of marking up machine-readable data in HTML documents. RDFa provides a set of HTML attributes to augment visual data with machine-readable hints. Using RDFa, authors may turn their existing human-visible text and links into machine-readable data without repeating content.
-
-
amp.dev amp.dev
-
Every AMP document needs to have a link referencing the "canonical" version of that document. We'll learn more about what canonical pages are and different approaches to canonical linking in the Making your page discoverable step of this tutorial.
-
-
amp.dev amp.dev
-
Canonical linking in regular HTML pages is a common technique for declaring which page should be considered the preferred page when multiple pages include the same content.
-