It' is pretty good to see the mapping innovation taking several shapes, from the starting narrative to this one.

Regarding feedback from this one I would make a call out that make more visible where the data and code behind the map is hosted and how to reproduce the results.

On a more general sense, I think is important to see how the different narratives are better connected and which values they embody and make explicit. I would propose this values:

1. Utility:

   • internal: helping us to make short or long lasting peer to peer connections like the one between Copincha (Habana, Cuba) and HackBo/Grafoscopio (Bogotá, Colombia) communities resulting from DOTS 202.
   • external to showcase which innovation, people and communities are doing and how they are connected now or can be in the future.

2. Reproducibility: The data narratives should be able to be reproducible.

3. Portability: Functionality bundles, including data, code, software should be packages to they can be used in local contexts, particularly those with low/intermittent internet connectivity.

4. Recontextualization: Our data narratives should be empowering its reuse, adaptation, and extension by other communities and in other context.

5. Commons/Community oriented: licenses on data/code should be explicit to allow the previous qualities. Some times that would require a copyfarleft license that protect third parties extract value from the data narratives and its bundles against the community interest (cfg current discussion on data collection from IA projects against community of creators).