applicants need to submit 25 applications to ensure at least one recommendation with 99.9% probability
在算法单一文化下,求职者需要投出25份申请才能以99.9%概率获得至少一次推荐;独立决策情景下只需10份。差距2.5倍,意味着算法垄断额外消耗了求职者大量时间和精力,且这个成本完全由求职者而非算法供应商承担。这是一种隐性的「搜索摩擦」转移。
applicants need to submit 25 applications to ensure at least one recommendation with 99.9% probability
在算法单一文化下,求职者需要投出25份申请才能以99.9%概率获得至少一次推荐;独立决策情景下只需10份。差距2.5倍,意味着算法垄断额外消耗了求职者大量时间和精力,且这个成本完全由求职者而非算法供应商承担。这是一种隐性的「搜索摩擦」转移。
Directed AARs
解法很直觉:在起点处强制分散。但这背后有深层含义:AI研究的多样性不是涌现的,而是需要人工注入的。人类研究者因个人背景、审美偏好、偶然阅读而自然走向不同方向;AI研究员的均质性在探索效率上是系统性劣势,必须通过外部设计来弥补。
如何评价 Meta 的代码搜索系统 Glean?
函数式编程如何实现动态规划和记忆化搜索?
搜索引擎的工作原理是什么?
Poets and philosophers have warned almost forever against this kind of comfort. Socrates famously claimed that his wisdom came from knowing he knew nothing. John Keats defined “negative capability” — a quality he attributed to men “of Achievement” — as the ability to stay “in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact & reason.” Donald Barthelme, in his 1985 essay “Not-Knowing,” argues that it is “what permits art to be made.” Georges Bataille thought “non-knowledge” was inherent to the human condition. The “unknowable immensity” of the universe “infinitely eludes an individual who seeks it,” he writes in Inner Experience (1943). Knowledge is “the means [by] which man attempts to take himself for the whole of the universe.” Designed to reduce the world to the answers it can provide, Google belies (or tries to belie) the universe’s infinite elusiveness.
诗人和哲学家几乎一直警告人们不要这样安逸。苏格拉底有句名言: 他的智慧来自于知道自己一无所知。约翰·济慈把 "消极能力"——一种他认为“有成就的人”所具有的品质——定义为 "处于不确定、神秘、疑惑之中,而不急于追求事实和理性"的能力。唐纳德·巴特尔姆在1985年的文章《无知》中认为,这是 "允许艺术被创造的原因"。乔治·巴泰尔(Georges Bataille)认为 "不知道"是人类与生俱来的。他在《内心体验》(1943)中写道,宇宙的“不可知的无限”,“无限地逃避着寻找它的个人”。知识是 "人类试图将自己视为整个宇宙的手段"。谷歌的目的是将世界简化为它能提供的答案,它掩盖了(或试图掩盖)宇宙的无限不可捉摸性。
我才知道,图片搜索的字是每次搜索时联想出来的。
也支持时间