- Aug 2018
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Evidence for primary claim
What evidence is given for the primary claim?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div> -
Evidence for primary claim
What evidence is given for the primary claim?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.23.01:Correlation", "1.23.02:Cause precedes effect", "1.23.03:The correlation appears across multiple independent contexts", "1.23.04:A plausible mechanism is proposed", "1.23.05:An experimental study was conducted (natural experiments OK)", "1.23.06:Experts are cited", "1.23.07:Other kind of evidence", "1.23.08:No evidence given" ]</div> -
Causal claims
Is a general or singular causal claim made?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.22.01:General causal claim", "1.22.02:Singular causal claim", "1.22.03:No causal claim" ]</div> -
Exaggerated claims
Does the author exaggerate claims?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.21.01:Yes", "1.21.02:Sort of", "1.21.03:No" ]</div> -
Emotionally charged tone
Does the author use outrage, snark, celebration, horror, etc?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.20.01:Yes", "1.20.02:Sort of", "1.20.03:No" ]</div> -
Naturalistic fallacy
Does the author suggest something is good because it is natural, or bad because it is not natural?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.19.01:Yes", "1.19.02:Sort of", "1.19.03:No" ]</div> -
Scare tactics
Does the author exaggerate the dangers of a situation (the appeal to fear fallacy)?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.18.01:Yes", "1.18.02:Sort of", "1.18.03:No" ]</div> -
Slippery slope
Does the author say that one small change will lead to a major change?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.17.01:Yes", "1.17.02:Sort of", "1.17.03:No" ]</div> -
False dilemma
Does the author present a complicated choice as if it were binary?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.16.01:Yes", "1.16.02:Sort of", "1.16.03:No" ]</div> -
Straw man argument
Highlight straw man example #2
-
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Straw man argument
Highlight straw man example #1
-
Straw man argument
Does the author present a counterargument as a weaker, more foolish version of the real counterargument?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div> -
Confidence in claims made by sources
To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.13.01:Completely justified", "1.13.02:Mostly justified", "1.13.03:Somewhat justified", "1.13.04:Slightly justified", "1.13.05:Not at all justified" ]</div> -
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Other types of sources
Other source #1
-
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Other types of sources
Other source #1
-
Other types of sources
Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.12.01:Yes", "1.12.02:No" ]</div> -
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #3
-
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #2
-
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #1
-
ion-and-answer session. “There are no charges against him. There is no collusion.”Grim-faced as she fielded a variety of questio
Expert sources
Highlight expert source #1
-
Types of sources
Which of the following are cited?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08.02:Experts", "1.08.03:Studies", "1.08.04:Organizations" ]</div> -
Types of sources
Does the article cite sources?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div> -
Single study?
Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div> -
Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
Please describe other ways in which the title is clickbaity
Answer: [[alksjd]]
-
Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div> -
Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Clickbaitiness
Is the headline clickbaity
Choices:
<div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div> -
Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div> -
Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>
Tags
- answer:1.19.03
- answer:1.22.03
- answer:1.05.02, 1.05.08
- Q09_02
- Q19
- answer:1.18.03
- Q16
- Q23
- Q15
- Q21
- answer:1.13.04
- answer:1.04.03
- Q12
- answer:1.17.03
- Q20
- Q09_03
- Q05
- Q18
- Q12_02
- answer:1.01.05
- answer:1.23.08
- Q13
- answer:annotation
- Q08b
- Q08a
- answer:1.21.03
- CredCoContentAnnotation
- answer:1.02.04
- Q12_01
- answer:skipped
- answer:1.08.02
- answer:1.08a.01
- Q06
- Q17
- answer:1.20.03
- answer:1.12.01
- answer:1.07.01
- Q07
- Q04
- Q15_02
- answer:text
- Q22
- Q15_01
- answer:1.15.01
- Q01
- answer:1.16.03
- Q09_01
- Q02
Annotators
URL
-
-
jonudell.info jonudell.info
-
Lorem ipsum
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div> -
Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>
-
-
www.npr.org www.npr.org
-
Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div> -
How School Walkouts Test Student Rights And School Responsibilities
Title Representativeness
How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)
Choices:
<div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.03.01, 1.03.05, 1.03.07</div> -
How School Walkouts Test Student Rights And School Responsibilities
Title Representativeness
Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?
Choices:
<div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.02.02</div> -
Overall Credibility
Rate your impression of the credibility of this article
Choices:
<div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>Answer:
<div>1.01.02</div>
-
- Jul 2018
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com