Case: IP #26 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 23; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 23

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #30 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 20; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4120C>T p.Arg1374Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #42 in type U VWD sub-cohort (also in row 26 table 6)

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 9; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 41

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.7645T>C p.Cys2549Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: not found

CAID: CA383489376

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #22 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 34; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 27; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 95

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4022G>A p.Arg1341Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 291

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613944) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019396-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5801T>G p.Val1934Gly

ClinVarID: 627336

gnomAD: 0.00006260 (101 in 1613356) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6011658-A-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #37 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 15; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 25

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4241T>G p.Val1414Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 619752

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #23 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1/M) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 14

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4094T>C p.Leu1365Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2438545

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #10 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 18; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 55

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3586T>C p.Cys1196Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100270

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614220) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6021988-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4