Miss Clack's thought after Mr. Bruff's statement that she did not have the slightest pecuniary interest in Chapter III turns out to be self-comfort. It was not her true thought that she would have rejected a little legacy so that no enemies could have doubted her motive.

1. Not the largest (and Dana knows this)
2. Not a Government review (and Dana knows this)

At best the "Swiss Report" was a very limited assessment of select literature. The ongoing misrepresentation of this publication caused Felix Gurtner of the Federal Office of Public Health FOPH, Health and Accident Insurance Directorate, Bern, Switzerland posted a letter to the editor of Swiss Medical Weekly entitled The report “Homeopathy in healthcare: effectiveness, appropriateness, safety, costs” is not a “Swiss report” to clarify this. Dana is very aware of this, but continues to misinform his readership with this blatantly and demonstrably false claim.

Given how often this has been pointed out there is only one reasonable conclusion for him continuing to put this out there.

Dana Ullman is a liar.

Stunning, hair raising bullshit!

I love how this writing "isn't about Rhetoric" and now we are not just being told about the art of it, but how to acquire it. Smooth.