2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2015 Jul 18, Jan Tunér commented:

      Unfortunately, this study cannot be evaluated since the documentation of the actual laser parameters is poor. The only information given about these essential facts is "The LILT device had a wavelength of 905 nm and an average power of 0-60 mW. All LILT treatments were for 5 min per site." Which output was actually used? Pulse repetition rate? Dose? Power density?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2015 Jul 18, Jan Tunér commented:

      Unfortunately, this study cannot be evaluated since the documentation of the actual laser parameters is poor. The only information given about these essential facts is "The LILT device had a wavelength of 905 nm and an average power of 0-60 mW. All LILT treatments were for 5 min per site." Which output was actually used? Pulse repetition rate? Dose? Power density?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.