2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2013 Jun 14, Robert Tibshirani commented:

      I did a thorough re-analysis of the data in this paper, and it shed serious doubt on the validity of the findings. My re-analysis was briefly summarized in NEJM at http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200504073521422 and in much more detail in http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/FL/report

      I use this example as a teaching tool, demonstrating how the lack of reproducibility of findings is a serious problem, especially in the age of "big data".


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2013 Jun 14, Robert Tibshirani commented:

      I did a thorough re-analysis of the data in this paper, and it shed serious doubt on the validity of the findings. My re-analysis was briefly summarized in NEJM at http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200504073521422 and in much more detail in http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/FL/report

      I use this example as a teaching tool, demonstrating how the lack of reproducibility of findings is a serious problem, especially in the age of "big data".


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.