On 2013 Nov 09, Subhash Thakre commented:

This article is an effort to assess the quality and strengths of study findings. it has also addressed the issue in various corollary. I liked it very much.

On 2013 Oct 23, Hilda Bastian commented:

The conclusions of this paper (Ioannidis JP, 2005) were challenged by Goodman and Greenfield in 2007 (and responded to by Ioannidis JP, 2007). They were also challenged by Jager and Leek (Jager LR, 2014). Those authors conclude, using a different analytical approach (false discovery rate), that the literature reliably charts scientific progress. Ioannidis then responds to this discussion, challenging the data and analytical approach here: (Ioannidis JP, 2014). (I discuss this debate in a blog post.)

On 2013 Oct 23, Hilda Bastian commented:

The conclusions of this paper (Ioannidis JP, 2005) were challenged by Goodman and Greenfield in 2007 (and responded to by Ioannidis JP, 2007). They were also challenged by Jager and Leek (Jager LR, 2014). Those authors conclude, using a different analytical approach (false discovery rate), that the literature reliably charts scientific progress. Ioannidis then responds to this discussion, challenging the data and analytical approach here: (Ioannidis JP, 2014). (I discuss this debate in a blog post.)

On 2013 Nov 09, Subhash Thakre commented:

This article is an effort to assess the quality and strengths of study findings. it has also addressed the issue in various corollary. I liked it very much.