On 2013 Oct 25, Martin Fenner commented:

Ivan, If the paper is retracted, could I expect a notice on PubMed and/or the publisher website. I don't see any indication of the retraction in either of those places.

On 2013 Oct 20, Ivan Oransky commented:

This study has been retracted. Here's background from Retraction Watch (which I co-founded): http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/retraction-appears-for-stem-cell-researcher-found-to-have-used-funds-for-his-companys-gain/

And here is corresponding author Gerold Feuer's response to the retraction, in which he says he can "unequivocally state that the data in all published manuscripts is valid and sound and is not falsified or fabricated": http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/stem-cell-scientist-says-data-in-retracted-paper-is-not-falsified-or-fabricated/

On 2013 Oct 20, Ivan Oransky commented:

This study has been retracted. Here's background from Retraction Watch (which I co-founded): http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/retraction-appears-for-stem-cell-researcher-found-to-have-used-funds-for-his-companys-gain/

And here is corresponding author Gerold Feuer's response to the retraction, in which he says he can "unequivocally state that the data in all published manuscripts is valid and sound and is not falsified or fabricated": http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/stem-cell-scientist-says-data-in-retracted-paper-is-not-falsified-or-fabricated/