2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2014 Aug 27, Jorge H Ramírez commented:

      I recently mentioned the RE-LY study in a previous comment yesterday via PubMed Commons. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138329#cm25138329_5938

      This will be also my last comment via PubMed commons related to dabigatran or the RE-LY study (the only exception are possible replies to comments related to these posts).

      Information about dabigatran & the RE-LY study

      1. Cohen Deborah. Concerns over data in key dabigatran trial BMJ 2014; 349:g4747

      2. Cohen Deborah. Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses BMJ 2014; 349:g4670

      3. Moore Thomas J, Cohen Michael R, Mattison Donald R. Dabigatran, bleeding, and the regulators BMJ 2014; 349:g4517

      4. Charlton Blake, Redberg Rita. The trouble with dabigatran BMJ 2014; 349:g4681

      5. Jackson Trevor. Dabigatran and statins: faith, hype, and transparency BMJ 2014; 349:g4793

      6. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Requested (Jul 29, 2014) & Retracted by the author (Aug 23, 2014): "Conelly S, et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1139-1151"] - Question Thread Open. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1144305

      7. Bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban. Prescrire Int 2013; 22 (139): 155-159.

      8. Dabigatran for atrial fibrillation: why we can not rely on RE-LY http://www.ti.ubc.ca/sites/ti.ubc.ca/files/80.pdf

      9. The use, misuse and abuse of dabigatran https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/7/use-misuse-and-abuse-dabigatran

      10. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Dabigatran (Pradaxa): 81.4% of registered studies in ClinicalTrials.gov are unpublished. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1116303

      Competing interests: Already declared in previous comment posted in PubMed commons (1st URL above)


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2014 Aug 27, Jorge H Ramírez commented:

      I recently mentioned the RE-LY study in a previous comment yesterday via PubMed Commons. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138329#cm25138329_5938

      This will be also my last comment via PubMed commons related to dabigatran or the RE-LY study (the only exception are possible replies to comments related to these posts).

      Information about dabigatran & the RE-LY study

      1. Cohen Deborah. Concerns over data in key dabigatran trial BMJ 2014; 349:g4747

      2. Cohen Deborah. Dabigatran: how the drug company withheld important analyses BMJ 2014; 349:g4670

      3. Moore Thomas J, Cohen Michael R, Mattison Donald R. Dabigatran, bleeding, and the regulators BMJ 2014; 349:g4517

      4. Charlton Blake, Redberg Rita. The trouble with dabigatran BMJ 2014; 349:g4681

      5. Jackson Trevor. Dabigatran and statins: faith, hype, and transparency BMJ 2014; 349:g4793

      6. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Requested (Jul 29, 2014) & Retracted by the author (Aug 23, 2014): "Conelly S, et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1139-1151"] - Question Thread Open. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1144305

      7. Bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban. Prescrire Int 2013; 22 (139): 155-159.

      8. Dabigatran for atrial fibrillation: why we can not rely on RE-LY http://www.ti.ubc.ca/sites/ti.ubc.ca/files/80.pdf

      9. The use, misuse and abuse of dabigatran https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/198/7/use-misuse-and-abuse-dabigatran

      10. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Dabigatran (Pradaxa): 81.4% of registered studies in ClinicalTrials.gov are unpublished. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1116303

      Competing interests: Already declared in previous comment posted in PubMed commons (1st URL above)


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.