2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2013 Oct 25, Gary Mirams commented:

      I would like to draw attention to the fact that the results indicated in our paper for the Decker 2009 model in Figure 5 are inaccurate, due to a bug in the CellML representation of the model. There are details in a blog entry here.

      This doesn't contradict any of the conclusions of the paper (we did suggest in one case that "This suggests the possibility that the CellML implementation of the model still requires curation"). Rather, this observation strengthens the idea that the community must do more rigorous curation of models. But I want to notify readers that the results shown for the Decker 2009 model are inaccurate.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2013 Oct 25, Gary Mirams commented:

      I would like to draw attention to the fact that the results indicated in our paper for the Decker 2009 model in Figure 5 are inaccurate, due to a bug in the CellML representation of the model. There are details in a blog entry here.

      This doesn't contradict any of the conclusions of the paper (we did suggest in one case that "This suggests the possibility that the CellML implementation of the model still requires curation"). Rather, this observation strengthens the idea that the community must do more rigorous curation of models. But I want to notify readers that the results shown for the Decker 2009 model are inaccurate.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.