2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2013 Aug 10, Allison Stelling commented:

      I find it a bit odd that the authors call for a national discussion on a very important topic in a journal that has put their words behind a paywall.

      Biomedical science has a huge public impact, and the public needs to be aware how little we know about how to diagnose many diseases; let alone our lack of information on "cures". They are footing the majority of the bill and have a fundamental right to have the science explained to them. This is not a discussion that the researchers and "qualified experts" can keep within their own limited community; nor is it a one way lecture where interaction with the public is unidirectional. It's a conversation that needs to happen between medical doctors, the public taxpayers, and the scientific researchers.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2013 Aug 10, Allison Stelling commented:

      I find it a bit odd that the authors call for a national discussion on a very important topic in a journal that has put their words behind a paywall.

      Biomedical science has a huge public impact, and the public needs to be aware how little we know about how to diagnose many diseases; let alone our lack of information on "cures". They are footing the majority of the bill and have a fundamental right to have the science explained to them. This is not a discussion that the researchers and "qualified experts" can keep within their own limited community; nor is it a one way lecture where interaction with the public is unidirectional. It's a conversation that needs to happen between medical doctors, the public taxpayers, and the scientific researchers.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.