On 2017 Aug 21, John M Darlow commented:

Dear Anne, Thank you for detecting that there is a small error, but you have corrected the wrong bit! As you can verify by typing the rs numbers into, e.g., the UCSC Genome Browser, the two SNPs in question ARE in the gene KIAA1324, on 1p13.3, as correctly stated in the paper. The error is that the old name of the gene was 'EIG121' not 'EIG121L'. If you had looked up the gene KIAA1324L (old name EIG121L) you would have found that that gene is on 7q21.12!

On 2017 Aug 15, Anne Niknejad commented:

Error:

'There are two adjacent significant results on 1p13.3 in KIAA1324 alias EIG121L,...'

should be

'There are two adjacent significant results on 1p13.3 in KIAA1324L alias EIG121L,...'

On 2017 Aug 15, Anne Niknejad commented:

Error:

'There are two adjacent significant results on 1p13.3 in KIAA1324 alias EIG121L,...'

should be

'There are two adjacent significant results on 1p13.3 in KIAA1324L alias EIG121L,...'

On 2017 Aug 21, John M Darlow commented:

Dear Anne, Thank you for detecting that there is a small error, but you have corrected the wrong bit! As you can verify by typing the rs numbers into, e.g., the UCSC Genome Browser, the two SNPs in question ARE in the gene KIAA1324, on 1p13.3, as correctly stated in the paper. The error is that the old name of the gene was 'EIG121' not 'EIG121L'. If you had looked up the gene KIAA1324L (old name EIG121L) you would have found that that gene is on 7q21.12!