2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2015 Aug 13, Lydia Maniatis commented:

      The authors' say that "The data also argue against an image decomposition mechanism" as an explanation of the snake illusion. This claim hinges on having controlled for apparent transparency/illumination effects in some of their stimuli. However, as they themselves acknowledge in the article, their stimuli still present such effects, despite the investigators' having removed some features, like X-junctions, commonly associated with transparency effects. Thus, their claim vis a vis image decomposition cannot be said to have been corroborated.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2015 Aug 13, Lydia Maniatis commented:

      The authors' say that "The data also argue against an image decomposition mechanism" as an explanation of the snake illusion. This claim hinges on having controlled for apparent transparency/illumination effects in some of their stimuli. However, as they themselves acknowledge in the article, their stimuli still present such effects, despite the investigators' having removed some features, like X-junctions, commonly associated with transparency effects. Thus, their claim vis a vis image decomposition cannot be said to have been corroborated.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.