On 2015 Nov 09, Benito de Celis Alonso commented:

As the main author of this work, I have to warn readers that some data in Table 1 and Figure 3 is wrong. In it, the positions of significantly activated areas are given in mm (cube coordinate space) instead of MNI as it says in the text. Figure´s legend should read as: 72, 49,45 corresponds to: 52, -30, 16 Right Sup. Temporal Lobe 33, 33, 43 corresponds to: -26, -62, 12 Left Calcarine 33, 68, 68 corresponds: to: -26, 8, 62 Left Mid Frontal Lobe. 54, 68 68 corresponds to: 16, 8 , 62 Left Mid Frontal Lobe. 45, 45, 58 corresponds to -2, -38, 42 Left Mid Cingulum. Table 2 should have corrected its second and third column (from mm to MNI) as well as the last column (some regions changed laterality) A correction for this paper has been asked to be made to the journal. New version of the Table 1 can be downloaded from my website: www.benitodecelisalonso.com. Go to the English version of it and after my personal welcome text there is a download with the correct file. Would like to thank Dr. Castellanos for noticing this mistake. I would also like to comment that analysis was still correctly performed as described in the text and just a misspelling of data happened here. Yours, Dr. Benito de Celis

On 2015 Oct 31, Francisco Xavier Castellanos commented:

Dr. Benito de Celis Alonso has communicated that he intends to submit an erratum to provide the MNI coordinates corresponding to Table 1. Readers interested in obtaining those values should contact him in the interim.

On 2015 Oct 17, Francisco Xavier Castellanos commented:

Interesting paper, but the coordinates provided in Table 1 are not in MNI space; they are likely the "mm-coordinates" which are also provided by the analytic software. Can the authors provide the corrected coordinates, perhaps as an erratum?

On 2015 Oct 17, Francisco Xavier Castellanos commented:

Interesting paper, but the coordinates provided in Table 1 are not in MNI space; they are likely the "mm-coordinates" which are also provided by the analytic software. Can the authors provide the corrected coordinates, perhaps as an erratum?

On 2015 Oct 31, Francisco Xavier Castellanos commented:

Dr. Benito de Celis Alonso has communicated that he intends to submit an erratum to provide the MNI coordinates corresponding to Table 1. Readers interested in obtaining those values should contact him in the interim.

On 2015 Nov 09, Benito de Celis Alonso commented:

As the main author of this work, I have to warn readers that some data in Table 1 and Figure 3 is wrong. In it, the positions of significantly activated areas are given in mm (cube coordinate space) instead of MNI as it says in the text. Figure´s legend should read as: 72, 49,45 corresponds to: 52, -30, 16 Right Sup. Temporal Lobe 33, 33, 43 corresponds to: -26, -62, 12 Left Calcarine 33, 68, 68 corresponds: to: -26, 8, 62 Left Mid Frontal Lobe. 54, 68 68 corresponds to: 16, 8 , 62 Left Mid Frontal Lobe. 45, 45, 58 corresponds to -2, -38, 42 Left Mid Cingulum. Table 2 should have corrected its second and third column (from mm to MNI) as well as the last column (some regions changed laterality) A correction for this paper has been asked to be made to the journal. New version of the Table 1 can be downloaded from my website: www.benitodecelisalonso.com. Go to the English version of it and after my personal welcome text there is a download with the correct file. Would like to thank Dr. Castellanos for noticing this mistake. I would also like to comment that analysis was still correctly performed as described in the text and just a misspelling of data happened here. Yours, Dr. Benito de Celis