2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2015 Mar 28, Edward Archer commented:

      Hébert et al.’s defense of the status quo is an impediment to both scientific progress and empirically supported public nutrition policy.

      For details please see the following:

      "Implausible data, false memories, and the status quo in dietary assessment." Archer, E., Blair, S.N. Adv Nutr. 2015 Mar 13;6(2):229-30. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007799.

      and

      "Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971-2010." Archer et al., PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e76632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076632.

      Link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076632


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2015 Mar 28, Edward Archer commented:

      Hébert et al.’s defense of the status quo is an impediment to both scientific progress and empirically supported public nutrition policy.

      For details please see the following:

      "Implausible data, false memories, and the status quo in dietary assessment." Archer, E., Blair, S.N. Adv Nutr. 2015 Mar 13;6(2):229-30. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007799.

      and

      "Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric energy intake data, 1971-2010." Archer et al., PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e76632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076632.

      Link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0076632


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.