2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2014 Sep 30, Ryan Radecki commented:

      Post-publication commentary:

      "Emergency PCI for STEMI is Dead?"

      This somewhat befuddling study tries desperately to create a problem where there probably truly wasn’t – but as soon as the conflict-of-interest disclosures come up, it’s clear why.

      This is the 1-year outcomes from STREAM, a prospective, open-label, parallel-group trial enrolling participants with acute STEMI, but unlikely to undergo primary PCI within 1 hour of diagnosis. Participants were then randomized to either still undergo emergency PCI, or to fibrinolysis followed by urgent or emergency rescue PCI. The initial 1-month composite outcome, despite an excess of deaths secondary to intracranial hemorrhage in the fibrinolysis group, did not demonstrate any disadvantage to fibrinolysis with delayed PCI. There was actually a 2% absolute decrease in the composite outcome favoring fibrinolysis – and thus the 1-year follow-up, hoping this small advantage in morbidity would translate into a measurable mortality advantage....

      http://www.emlitofnote.com/2014/09/emergency-pci-for-stemi-is-dead.html


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2014 Sep 30, Ryan Radecki commented:

      Post-publication commentary:

      "Emergency PCI for STEMI is Dead?"

      This somewhat befuddling study tries desperately to create a problem where there probably truly wasn’t – but as soon as the conflict-of-interest disclosures come up, it’s clear why.

      This is the 1-year outcomes from STREAM, a prospective, open-label, parallel-group trial enrolling participants with acute STEMI, but unlikely to undergo primary PCI within 1 hour of diagnosis. Participants were then randomized to either still undergo emergency PCI, or to fibrinolysis followed by urgent or emergency rescue PCI. The initial 1-month composite outcome, despite an excess of deaths secondary to intracranial hemorrhage in the fibrinolysis group, did not demonstrate any disadvantage to fibrinolysis with delayed PCI. There was actually a 2% absolute decrease in the composite outcome favoring fibrinolysis – and thus the 1-year follow-up, hoping this small advantage in morbidity would translate into a measurable mortality advantage....

      http://www.emlitofnote.com/2014/09/emergency-pci-for-stemi-is-dead.html


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.