2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2015 Sep 08, Kausik Datta commented:

      The authors make it a point to state: "Our results highlight (i) the scholarship and rational methodology of premodern medical professionals and (ii) the untapped potential of premodern remedies for yielding novel therapeutics at a time when new antibiotics are desperately needed."

      Can someone kindly explain to me how this study, while immensely interesting to me, is any different from regular ethnobotany or pharmacognosy studies?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2015 Sep 08, Kausik Datta commented:

      The authors make it a point to state: "Our results highlight (i) the scholarship and rational methodology of premodern medical professionals and (ii) the untapped potential of premodern remedies for yielding novel therapeutics at a time when new antibiotics are desperately needed."

      Can someone kindly explain to me how this study, while immensely interesting to me, is any different from regular ethnobotany or pharmacognosy studies?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.