On 2016 Jan 28, Andrew Jones commented:

Due to some over-vigorous editing, important descriptive statistics were missing from the paper. This was unfortunately missed by us (the authors). We thank Robert Hester (Melbourne) for drawing this to our attention after the paper was published. The data are reported below.

Stop signal task indices split by time and group. Values are Means (SDs)

Time 1:

                  Control    │    Stress

SSRT: 219.23 (38.56) │ 216.18 (34.28)

Go RTs: 515.72 (119.87) │ 525.53 (122.24)

Go Errors: 2.60 (2.84) │ 2.00 (1.76)

Stop Errors (%): 45.13 (9.11) │ 42.91 (10.83)

Time 2:

                  Control    │    Stress

SSRT: 215.02 (34.40) │ 212.97 (40.54)

Go RTs: 520.64 (136.00) │ 528.09 (131.84)

Go Errors: 2.94 (2.85) │ 3.00 (3.33)

Stop Errors (%): 45.71 (11.01) │ 44.24 (11.67)

On 2016 Jan 28, Andrew Jones commented:

Due to some over-vigorous editing, important descriptive statistics were missing from the paper. This was unfortunately missed by us (the authors). We thank Robert Hester (Melbourne) for drawing this to our attention after the paper was published. The data are reported below.

Stop signal task indices split by time and group. Values are Means (SDs)

Time 1:

                  Control    │    Stress

SSRT: 219.23 (38.56) │ 216.18 (34.28)

Go RTs: 515.72 (119.87) │ 525.53 (122.24)

Go Errors: 2.60 (2.84) │ 2.00 (1.76)

Stop Errors (%): 45.13 (9.11) │ 42.91 (10.83)

Time 2:

                  Control    │    Stress

SSRT: 215.02 (34.40) │ 212.97 (40.54)

Go RTs: 520.64 (136.00) │ 528.09 (131.84)

Go Errors: 2.94 (2.85) │ 3.00 (3.33)

Stop Errors (%): 45.71 (11.01) │ 44.24 (11.67)