On 2017 Mar 12, Christopher Southan commented:

This is an impressively thourough study of a new mouse smORF. However, despite the possible splicing out of codon five, database evidence indicates the major human sequence is not the 34 residues in the suplimentary data of this paper and Swiss-Prot P0DN84 but rather the 35 resides represented in in ENSG00000240045 (via Vega) and (circularly) in TrEMBL A0A1B0GTW0. There is an older independent cDNA translation as ACT64388 from 2009 as well as ~ 30 full-length matches from human ESTs. As the authors know, eventual submission of (by them?) of complete mouse and human cloned cDNAs with CDS annotations to GeneBank or EBI should eventually feed through the systems and thereby (on a good day) correct the protein/gene discrepancies (even if minor) and displace the misleading LncRNA annotations.

On 2017 Mar 12, Christopher Southan commented:

This is an impressively thourough study of a new mouse smORF. However, despite the possible splicing out of codon five, database evidence indicates the major human sequence is not the 34 residues in the suplimentary data of this paper and Swiss-Prot P0DN84 but rather the 35 resides represented in in ENSG00000240045 (via Vega) and (circularly) in TrEMBL A0A1B0GTW0. There is an older independent cDNA translation as ACT64388 from 2009 as well as ~ 30 full-length matches from human ESTs. As the authors know, eventual submission of (by them?) of complete mouse and human cloned cDNAs with CDS annotations to GeneBank or EBI should eventually feed through the systems and thereby (on a good day) correct the protein/gene discrepancies (even if minor) and displace the misleading LncRNA annotations.