On 2017 Sep 23, Karim Abbas commented:

I see the data in Figure 3 confusing and might involve a bias. Figure 1 clearly depicts a stable PS-LTP recorded for 15 minutes every day for successive 14 days. However, in Figure 3b the magnitude of PS-LTP with anisomycin (but without "reactivation" (Sic1)) looks decreasing from the values between 0-3 days, albeit non significantly (I guess the lack of significant differences was due to high SD; the values of SD were not reported in the article but can be seen in the figures). There is no explanation though for that tendency of decreasing PS magnitude compared to stable values depicted in Figure 2. More intriguing is why the recording interval following "reactivation" was restricted to 2 days (total 5 days), which is much shorter than the one depicted in Figure 1 (14 days)?

On 2017 Sep 23, Karim Abbas commented:

I see the data in Figure 3 confusing and might involve a bias. Figure 1 clearly depicts a stable PS-LTP recorded for 15 minutes every day for successive 14 days. However, in Figure 3b the magnitude of PS-LTP with anisomycin (but without "reactivation" (Sic1)) looks decreasing from the values between 0-3 days, albeit non significantly (I guess the lack of significant differences was due to high SD; the values of SD were not reported in the article but can be seen in the figures). There is no explanation though for that tendency of decreasing PS magnitude compared to stable values depicted in Figure 2. More intriguing is why the recording interval following "reactivation" was restricted to 2 days (total 5 days), which is much shorter than the one depicted in Figure 1 (14 days)?