6 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Jun 26, David Smith commented:

      All statistical maps derived from the re-analysis with GingerALE 2.3.6 have been uploaded to the NeuroVault repository: http://neurovault.org/collections/1406/

      We emphasize that the re-analysis confirmed that all of our key claims are valid.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2016 Jul 22, Christopher Tench commented:

      Excellent. This is science!


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    3. On 2016 Jun 24, David Smith commented:

      Thanks for pointing this out. Our original analyses used a conservative threshold, and we have confirmed that our key results hold with a cluster-level FWE of p = 0.05, as implemented in the latest release of GingerALE (v2.3.6).

      Within the main text, two clusters failed to replicate in our new analyses. First, the inferior lateral occipital cortex (iLOC) cluster in Figure 3C (amygdala seed with emotion studies) did not pass cluster-level FWE of p = 0.05 (with a cluster-forming thresholds of p = 0.001 or p = 0.005). Second, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) cluster in Figure 3B (DLPFC seed with cognitive control studies) did not pass cluster-level FWE of p = 0.05 (with a cluster-forming thresholds of p = 0.001 or p = 0.005). Additionally, our re-analyses failed to confirm the findings in Supplemental Figure 2.

      We will reach out to the journal (HBM) to address these issues and indicate that our key claims were not affected by the bug in GingerALE (which was corrected after our article was accepted).

      Thanks again for bringing this to our attention.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    4. On 2016 Jun 14, Christopher Tench commented:

      This article uses a version of GingerALE (2.3.3) that has a known bug, which produces false positive results. The bug was fixed at 2.3.6. There is no evidence of statistical significance.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Jun 14, Christopher Tench commented:

      This article uses a version of GingerALE (2.3.3) that has a known bug, which produces false positive results. The bug was fixed at 2.3.6. There is no evidence of statistical significance.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2016 Jun 26, David Smith commented:

      All statistical maps derived from the re-analysis with GingerALE 2.3.6 have been uploaded to the NeuroVault repository: http://neurovault.org/collections/1406/

      We emphasize that the re-analysis confirmed that all of our key claims are valid.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.