On 2016 Jul 14, Thomas E. Nichols commented:

This work has two unfortunate statements that can be misunderstood to mean that the findings apply to all "40,000" publications in the fMRI literature. The following two corrections will resolve this problem:

The last sentence of the Significance statement should read: “These results question the validity of a number of fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of weakly significant neuroimaging results.”

The first sentence after the heading “The future of fMRI” should have read: “Due to lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices it is unlikely that problematic analyses can be redone.”

For more on this, see the blog entry "Bibliometrics of Cluster Inference" http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/nichols/entry/bibliometrics_of_cluster/

On 2016 Jul 14, Thomas E. Nichols commented:

This work has two unfortunate statements that can be misunderstood to mean that the findings apply to all "40,000" publications in the fMRI literature. The following two corrections will resolve this problem:

The last sentence of the Significance statement should read: “These results question the validity of a number of fMRI studies and may have a large impact on the interpretation of weakly significant neuroimaging results.”

The first sentence after the heading “The future of fMRI” should have read: “Due to lamentable archiving and data-sharing practices it is unlikely that problematic analyses can be redone.”

For more on this, see the blog entry "Bibliometrics of Cluster Inference" http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/nichols/entry/bibliometrics_of_cluster/