On 2016 Oct 28, Wichor Bramer commented:

I spotted a very small error that might lead to confusion in table 1: In C3 it says: "Review the top references without page numbers and those with page numbers, starting with number 1 for equivalent author names."

We meant: "Review the top references, those without page numbers and those with page numbers starting with number 1, for equivalent author names."

It is not necessary to review all references manually. Only the references that lack a page number, or the ones starting with 1 (1-3, 1-27 etc) can potentially contain false duplicates, and should be checked manually.

On 2016 Oct 28, Wichor Bramer commented:

I spotted a very small error that might lead to confusion in table 1: In C3 it says: "Review the top references without page numbers and those with page numbers, starting with number 1 for equivalent author names."

We meant: "Review the top references, those without page numbers and those with page numbers starting with number 1, for equivalent author names."

It is not necessary to review all references manually. Only the references that lack a page number, or the ones starting with 1 (1-3, 1-27 etc) can potentially contain false duplicates, and should be checked manually.