3 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2016 Sep 19, Prashant Sharma, MD, DM commented:

      Quoted from the abstract above, "Following WHO recommendations, refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-2 diagnosis is not possible in MDS-E, as patients with 10% to < 20% BM blasts from TNCs fulfill erythroleukemia criteria".

      Err... where would WHO 2008 place a case with 51% erythroid cells and 3% blasts with Auer rods that's negative for the leukemia-defining recurring genetic abnormalities?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2016 Sep 19, Prashant Sharma, MD, DM commented:

      Very interesting... This would certainly upgrade more than a few cases. Hopefully the WHO is listening, and other large centres are reanalyzing their marrow differentials for confirming/refuting this "game-changing" paper.

      What about the blast% in remission status marrows from acute leukemia patients? Its currently mostly done from TNCs, but based on this study is it possible that calculating it from NECs would provide better prognostication?

      • Prashant Sharma, Assoc. Prof. of Hematology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2016 Sep 19, Prashant Sharma, MD, DM commented:

      Very interesting... This would certainly upgrade more than a few cases. Hopefully the WHO is listening, and other large centres are reanalyzing their marrow differentials for confirming/refuting this "game-changing" paper.

      What about the blast% in remission status marrows from acute leukemia patients? Its currently mostly done from TNCs, but based on this study is it possible that calculating it from NECs would provide better prognostication?

      • Prashant Sharma, Assoc. Prof. of Hematology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.