2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2017 Apr 07, Peter Hajek commented:

      This paper presents some interesting data, but the language it uses is misleading. The word ‘initiation’ implies a start of regular use, but the data concern mostly a single instance when people tried an e-cigarette. Among non-smokers, progression to regular vaping is extremely rare. Trying vaping once or twice and never going back to it does not initiate anything. (Among smokers, a switch to vaping is a good thing).

      Describing e-cigarette use as ‘e-cigarettes smoking’ is another misleading sound-bite. Vaping poses only a small fraction of risks of smoking.

      Finally, preventing e-cigarette use is not ‘tobacco use prevention’. Vaping does not include use of tobacco. If the authors mean by this phrase that experimentation with e-cigarettes inevitably leads to smoking, there is no sign of that. Smoking prevalence in youth is declining at an unprecedented rate.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2017 Apr 07, Peter Hajek commented:

      This paper presents some interesting data, but the language it uses is misleading. The word ‘initiation’ implies a start of regular use, but the data concern mostly a single instance when people tried an e-cigarette. Among non-smokers, progression to regular vaping is extremely rare. Trying vaping once or twice and never going back to it does not initiate anything. (Among smokers, a switch to vaping is a good thing).

      Describing e-cigarette use as ‘e-cigarettes smoking’ is another misleading sound-bite. Vaping poses only a small fraction of risks of smoking.

      Finally, preventing e-cigarette use is not ‘tobacco use prevention’. Vaping does not include use of tobacco. If the authors mean by this phrase that experimentation with e-cigarettes inevitably leads to smoking, there is no sign of that. Smoking prevalence in youth is declining at an unprecedented rate.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.