2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2017 May 06, Christopher Southan commented:

      IMCO it should have been incumbent on the Bentham Editor-in-Chief, the reviewing Editor and the 3 referees, to have spotted the severe grammatical problems and offered appropriate editorial support. This would have spared these non-native English authors the global embarrassment of publishing such a glaringly broken abstract. However, on checking, it looks like I could be naive in expecting this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentham_Science_Publishers).


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2017 May 06, Christopher Southan commented:

      IMCO it should have been incumbent on the Bentham Editor-in-Chief, the reviewing Editor and the 3 referees, to have spotted the severe grammatical problems and offered appropriate editorial support. This would have spared these non-native English authors the global embarrassment of publishing such a glaringly broken abstract. However, on checking, it looks like I could be naive in expecting this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bentham_Science_Publishers).


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.