2 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2017 May 14, Kiyoshi Ezawa commented:

      I think that this commentary is well written overall.

      Unfortunately, it lacks some important facts that would have assisted the readers' fair judgements.

      So, I have posted my post-publication peer review (PPPR), which also contains the aforementioned facts, onto PubPeer (https://pubpeer.com/publications/0BBC818513066058DB929595CE7C32/comments/120820).

      It would be strongly recommended to read the PPPR as well before or after reading this commentary, in order to have unbiased opinions on its subjects.

      Kiyoshi Ezawa, Ph.D., the author of references [53,54,55], which are a part of the main subjects of the commentary.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2017 May 14, Kiyoshi Ezawa commented:

      I think that this commentary is well written overall.

      Unfortunately, it lacks some important facts that would have assisted the readers' fair judgements.

      So, I have posted my post-publication peer review (PPPR), which also contains the aforementioned facts, onto PubPeer (https://pubpeer.com/publications/0BBC818513066058DB929595CE7C32/comments/120820).

      It would be strongly recommended to read the PPPR as well before or after reading this commentary, in order to have unbiased opinions on its subjects.

      Kiyoshi Ezawa, Ph.D., the author of references [53,54,55], which are a part of the main subjects of the commentary.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.