8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. On 2018 Feb 05, Johanna McEntyre commented:

      We do have a mechanism to do this ("External links") - we just need the databases to participate - something we are keen to see and will be encouraging within the context of ELIXIR over the foreseeable future. e.g. Here are all the papers cited in IntAct: http://europepmc.org/search?query=(HAS_INTACT:y)


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2018 Feb 03, Egon Willighagen commented:

      One thing that has been bugging me for some years now (see this write up) is that it is really hard to figure out which databases capture data in articles. An example is WikiPathways which has knowledge extracted from almost 20 thousand articles (unique PubMed IDs), but it is nearly impossible to figure out which databases have data related to some article.

      What would the database community need to do for Europe PMC to use links between articles and database entries?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    3. On 2018 Feb 02, Christopher Southan commented:

      OK, but AWK users assume sources are current by default. Any chance of cajoling EPO to re-instate the feed? (would arguably < ELIXIR value)


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    4. On 2018 Jan 30, Johanna McEntyre commented:

      There are over 4.2 million patents in Europe PMC, which we thought justified a passing mention in the article. No implication other than that was intended.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    5. On 2018 Jan 10, Christopher Southan commented:

      While the advances described for EPMC are impressive, it remains somewhat misleading to imply European Patent Office biotechnology abstracts as a current resource, since the feed ceased in 2012. Would be great if EPO could backfill these which would then uniquely facilitate // searching of patents and literature.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

  2. Feb 2018
    1. On 2018 Jan 10, Christopher Southan commented:

      While the advances described for EPMC are impressive, it remains somewhat misleading to imply European Patent Office biotechnology abstracts as a current resource, since the feed ceased in 2012. Would be great if EPO could backfill these which would then uniquely facilitate // searching of patents and literature.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    2. On 2018 Jan 30, Johanna McEntyre commented:

      There are over 4.2 million patents in Europe PMC, which we thought justified a passing mention in the article. No implication other than that was intended.


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.

    3. On 2018 Feb 03, Egon Willighagen commented:

      One thing that has been bugging me for some years now (see this write up) is that it is really hard to figure out which databases capture data in articles. An example is WikiPathways which has knowledge extracted from almost 20 thousand articles (unique PubMed IDs), but it is nearly impossible to figure out which databases have data related to some article.

      What would the database community need to do for Europe PMC to use links between articles and database entries?


      This comment, imported by Hypothesis from PubMed Commons, is licensed under CC BY.