Our

This is indeed a simple example. However, could you provide a few non-trivial use cases that are made really simple?

These figures are also missing axes labels.

Include this link in the abstract/introduction.

Figures have no labeling on the axes.

relevant to plasmonic

Despite these benefits, several issues impede nanobiosensing research.

Quality of the approach: meets Quality of the writing: meets Quality of the figures/tables: below

Is the code made publicly available and does the article sufficiently describe how to access it?

yes

Does the article present the problem in an appropriate context? Specifically, does it:

• explain why the problem is important --> yes
  • describe in which situations it arises --> yes outline relevant previous work -> cannot judge provide background information for non-experts -> yes

Is the content of the paper accessible to a computational scientist with no specific knowledge in the given field?

the article does provide some background that made it easier for me to follow, but i simply do not have expertise in the underlying domain.

Does the paper describe a well-formulated scientific or technical achievement?

appears to.

Are the technical and scientific decisions well-motivated and clearly explained? Are the code examples (if any) sound, clear, and well-written?

these are primarily driven by the need for a simple way to interact with the sensors.

Is the paper factual correct? Is the language and grammar of sufficient quality?

there are a few typos that i have noted, but otherwise yes.

Are the conclusions justified?

yes - from the perspective of simplicity.

Is prior work properly and fully cited?

i cannot comment on this.

Should any part of the article be shortened or expanded? Please explain. In your view, is the paper fit for publication in the conference proceedings? Please suggest specific improvements and indicate whether you think the article needs a significant rewrite (rather than a minor revision).

yes