- Last 7 days
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
An r-block b that repays a redemption claim with comment (redeem, P ), P =[p1, p2, . . . , pk], k ≥ 1, has a payment in pi-coins, i ∈ [k], provided the balance of r does notinclude any pj -coins for any 1 ≤ j < i at the time of creating b, and has a payment in r-coins,r /∈ P , provided the balance of r does not include any P -coins at the time of creating b
Why have signed coins?
Makes it possible to track which coins been equivocated.
But what's the use for it?
What's the difference between "you can't use these specific coins as they were equivocatedly used already" and "you can't use these opaque coins, as they are in equivocation"?
Later, at least, may succed given equivocation issuer have enough balance for both. Although then there's no point in creating equivocation in the first place. So nevermind, won't happen, except by silly equivocators.
-
C
That looks messy, accidentally so, it seems.
-
Green agent only needs to REDEEM(green_coin) op to convey what he wants.
-
Self-payments are redundant.
-
Links other than self-parent and other-parent(s) are redundant. You can derive anybody's balance out of their self-parent chain.
3.1 Other-parent_s_ make the order of received messages ambiguous.
REPAYis redundant. WhenREDEEMis received, and given one can indeed redeem (recepient has his coin at the moment of receival) - the REDEEM should be automatic. I.e., plainly observing thatREDEEMbeen accepted by recepient is enough to derive out of it one of 1) it's a suffessfull redeem 2) it's a failed redeem.
-
-
Agree to redeem any domestic coin issued in return for any foreign coin held. Forexample, Alice must agree to a request by Bob to redeem an Alice-coin Bob holds against any coin heldby Alice.
The device of Alice may be offline, e.g., smartphone discharged. We can't assume constant connectivity.
-
- Nov 2020
-
uxmovement.com uxmovement.com
-
You have 2 free member-only stories left this month.
-
- Jun 2020
-
www.rockpapershotgun.com www.rockpapershotgun.com
-
Oh, and of course, there’s the fact that “sit on the ground” is mapped to the same control as “strangle the nearest person”, which can apparently lead to some pretty robust brainstorming sessions.
I love this!
-
- May 2018
-
austin-sparks.net austin-sparks.net
-
Thus, leaving the whole of this broken-down state in the creation, you can see the creating of ages in Christ, by Christ, through Christ, according to God's eternal purpose that all things should be summed up in Him; not just the "all things" of our little life, of our little day, of our individual salvation, but the "all things" of a vast universe as a revelation of Christ, all being brought by revelation to the spiritual apprehension of man, and man being brought into it. What a Christ!
In my humble view, we do belittle and reduce Christ when we only speak of his being our redeemer. Of course its a fact that apart from his redeeming capacity there is no way we fallen humans can ever understand anything of spiritual matters. But its so true that our redemption is a great priority for God but I believe it is NOT the paramount purpose of God. Its striking to note that when the Holy Spirit describes the 7 fold glory of Christ, redemption is one of the last things that is mentioned. What a Christ!
-
- Mar 2017
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
If, then, you seem in the next half hour at times merely to be hearing words as sounds that come and go, I must beg your indulgence, or buy it with the promise that we shall come out again to practical problems in the everyday conduct of words.
Sounds like Andy Dufresne
-