Adding only retained reasoning and compaction, GPT-5.6 Sol’s ARC-AGI-3 score tripled from 13.3% to 38.3%.
比 AVO 的满分更有说服力:只动“保留推理”和“上下文压缩”两个开关,基线同源、变量可数,这才是消融实验该长的样子。但同样只在公开集上,且起点 13.3% 很低——低分区的三倍不能线性外推到高分区,压缩带来的收益通常随基线上升而衰减。
Adding only retained reasoning and compaction, GPT-5.6 Sol’s ARC-AGI-3 score tripled from 13.3% to 38.3%.
比 AVO 的满分更有说服力:只动“保留推理”和“上下文压缩”两个开关,基线同源、变量可数,这才是消融实验该长的样子。但同样只在公开集上,且起点 13.3% 很低——低分区的三倍不能线性外推到高分区,压缩带来的收益通常随基线上升而衰减。
This should not be interpreted as a controlled ablation: the two systems differ in agent backend, observation representation, memory, context management, and other implementation details.
全文最该被引用的一句:NVIDIA 自己先声明这不是受控消融。也就是说 12% 的动作数优势里,后端模型、观测表示、记忆、上下文管理四个变量同时在变,无法归因给任何单一设计。读跑分新闻时,这类作者自认的免责声明信息量往往大于标题数字。
Treatment of superficial vein reflux (see Varicose Veins, above) has been shown to decrease the recurrence rate of venous ulcers. Where there is substantial obstruction of the femoral or popliteal deep venous system, superficial varicosities supply the venous return and should not be removed.
Failure of venous insufficiency ulcerations to heal is most often due to inconsistent use of first-line treatment methods. Ongoing control of edema is essential to prevent recurrent ulceration; the use of compression stockings following ulcer healing is critical, with recurrence rates 2–20 times higher if compression stockings are not used
Venoactive drugs (diosmin, hesperidin, horse chestnut seed extract) may be considered as adjuncts to compression for symptomatic relief in countries where available
Endovenous ablation is contraindicated or relatively unsuitable when venous anatomy precludes catheter-based treatment, specifically: aneurysmal dilation of the GSV close to the saphenofemoral junction, subcutaneous location of truncal veins above the saphenous fascia and close to the skin, and significant tortuosity of the GSV or SSV. [1] In these scenarios, high ligation and stripping is recommended as the preferred alternative (grade 1 strong recommendation
Endovenous Thermal Ablation (RFA/EVLA)
Relative contraindications include inappropriate vein size, with veins <2 mm and >15 mm representing potential contraindications for RFA specifically. [1] A history of superficial thrombophlebitis resulting in a partially obstructed saphenous vein may preclude thermal ablation. [1] Significant tortuosity of the GSV on duplex examination can make catheter delivery difficult.
Ul2 poses lots of experiments comparing different pretraining approaches. Sequential, span corruption, to r,s,x denoiser Lots of ablation study