Programmatic access for creating, modifying, listing and deleting your connectors but also listing their tools and directly running them.
令人惊讶的是:Mistral不仅允许连接器的完整生命周期管理(创建、修改、列出和删除),还允许直接列出和运行连接器中的工具。这种直接工具调用功能为开发者提供了更精确的控制,特别适用于调试和管道式自动化场景。
Programmatic access for creating, modifying, listing and deleting your connectors but also listing their tools and directly running them.
令人惊讶的是:Mistral不仅允许连接器的完整生命周期管理(创建、修改、列出和删除),还允许直接列出和运行连接器中的工具。这种直接工具调用功能为开发者提供了更精确的控制,特别适用于调试和管道式自动化场景。
Second, I don't agree that there are too many small modules. In fact, I wish every common function existed as its own module. Even the maintainers of utility libraries like Underscore and Lodash have realized the benefits of modularity and allowed you to install individual utilities from their library as separate modules. From where I sit that seems like a smart move. Why should I import the entirety of Underscore just to use one function? Instead I'd rather see more "function suites" where a bunch of utilities are all published separately but under a namespace or some kind of common name prefix to make them easier to find. The way Underscore and Lodash have approached this issue is perfect. It gives consumers of their packages options and flexibility while still letting people like Dave import the whole entire library if that's what they really want to do.