实际效果就是你的 Claude Code、Cursor 或任何支持 MCP 的 AI Agent,可以直接'看到' 𝕏 上的实时数据并执行操作,不需要自己写 API 封装。
大多数人认为API集成总是需要开发者编写自定义封装代码,但作者强调xAI通过MCP协议实现了无缝集成,这暗示未来API设计可能转向更标准化的直接访问模式,挑战了当前API集成的复杂性常态。
实际效果就是你的 Claude Code、Cursor 或任何支持 MCP 的 AI Agent,可以直接'看到' 𝕏 上的实时数据并执行操作,不需要自己写 API 封装。
大多数人认为API集成总是需要开发者编写自定义封装代码,但作者强调xAI通过MCP协议实现了无缝集成,这暗示未来API设计可能转向更标准化的直接访问模式,挑战了当前API集成的复杂性常态。
They help streamlining the control flow, and take away control code while providing you with an incredibly cool developer experience.
You’re allowed to blame us for a terrible developer experience in Trailblazer 2.0. It’s been quite painful to find out which step caused an exception. However, don’t look back in anger! We’ve spent a lot of time on working out a beautiful way for both tracing and debugging Trailblazer activities in 2.1.
Finally, you can use fields_for in order to create/edit associated fields and the suffix _list (like profile_list below) to choose an existing associated record.
balancing developer and user experience
hygienic from an app-developer standpoint
I have no familiarity with Svelte internals, so much of your talk about what they would do eludes me. I'm just concerned with developer ergonomics
In general, my focus has shifted from optimization to DX. Partly because Svelte does a lot of the heavy lifting. For things that can be optimized on a need-to basis, I would rarely sacrifice DX.