The most notable finding here is that the model capabilities are improving _fast._ There are several domains that have shown dramatic improvements in the last 4 months — with accounting and auditing showing nearly a 20 percent jump on GDPval and even domains like police / detective work showing a nearly 30 percent improvement.
AI模型能力在短短4个月内取得显著进步，某些领域的能力提升高达20-30%，这一现象揭示了AI技术发展的指数级加速趋势。这种快速进步意味着当前的企业AI采用情况可能只是冰山一角，未来将有更多行业和场景因AI能力突破而迎来爆发式增长。
All of this happened in the background. This was just one of the parallel flows in a day. The productivity ceiling? Still unmaxxed.
作者暗示当前的生产力提升仍处于极早期阶段。其隐含假设是：随着模型自治时间的进一步延长和编排工具的成熟，人类的脑力劳动上限将被彻底重定义。当我们还在惊叹单日2.5亿token的消耗时，真正的奇点可能尚未到来。
it has a different representation of what to do if it gets injured in the future. It's a latent memory. It doesn't do anything until it gets injured. It just sits there and you would have no idea that it's there by looking at the at the anatomy. But if it's get if it gets injured, this is what its idea of a correct worm.
for - adjacency - stored latent memory of future morphology - can be altered - Michael Levin - potential progress trap
So there has to be a reality, deeper reality, out of which these spacetime reality that we call reality emerges. So so therefore the model to think of the model in your following way, consciousness is a quantum field.
for - quote - consciousness - model of - as a quantum field - Federico Faggin - question - about Federico Faggin's quantum field theory of consciousness - Is it neo-dualistic?
quote - consciousness - model of - as a quantum field - Federico Faggin - (see below) - Think of the body as a structure in space and time - It is both - classical - cells are made of particles, atoms and molecules that interact quantumly in space and time - AND fields - The body is a bridge between consciousness and the classical (objective spacetime) world - The body reports to the conscious field - and creates quantum states inside the cell
potential future dialogue - Michael Levin and Federico Faggin - To unpack quantum states at cellular or subcellular level, it would be good to see a dialogue between Michael Levin and Federico Faggin