3 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. 26, 27 Heterozygous2Nc.3673T > G p.Cys1225Gly 27 D3-E3 htz Missense O/A 50/42 29/44 40 CSA /69

      Case: IP #27 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 44; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 69

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3673T>G p.Cys1225Gly

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 100272

      CAID:

      gnomAD: absent

    2. 2 Type 2A c.-2522C>Tc.3586T>Cp.Cys1196Arg 27 D3-TIL-3htzhtzRegulatoryMissenseA 14 8RCo 34

      Case: 2

      DiseaseAssertion: type 2A VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 34

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.-2522C>T

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: not found

      CAID: not found

      gnomAD:

      MultipleGeneVariants:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3586T>C

      ClinVarID: 100270

    3. 10, 11 U c.3586T > C p.Cys1196Arg 27 D3-TIL-3 htz Missense A/O 21/18 18/12 RCo 55

      Case: IP #10 in type U VWD sub-cohort

      DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

      FamilyInfo:

      ParentalGenotype(s):

      CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

      CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 18; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 55

      CaseNOTHPOs:

      CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

      CasePreviousTesting:

      GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

      PreviouslyPublished:

      Gene: VWF

      Variant: c.3586T>C p.Cys1196Arg

      HGVS:

      ClinVarID: 100270

      CAID:

      gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1614220) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6021988-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4