This is akin to [[Monstertheorie 20030725114320]] spectrum (kiil the monster, adapt the monster, adapt cultural categories, embrace the monster) It is sort of logical that most of us will fall in the middle 2 groups, adapting both the tech and ourselves.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240611050132/https://jentery.github.io/ts200v2/notes.html

An interesting read turning a range of #psts issues into specific reflection questions to ask at the start of a tech project. With references to the background concepts. From 2018. #toread

Vgl [[Techpledge 20190917062614]] as the 'political' phrasing of same.

Wrt [[XZ open source kwetsbaar door psyops 20240331083508]] and examples referred to here, the author focuses on technology fixes to reduce risks. Whereas most of the problems highlighted are social aspects, for which no other solution is suggested than paying OSS devs who maintain stuff. That may well alleviate some of the social aspects that became an attack surface, but does nothing to look at Q of connections between devs and knitting those into relationships that are more resistant to social engineering and psyops. That and more transparency both on the social side of things and the chains. OSS is open source wrt the piece of software in front of you only.