Aren’t many in cybersecurity still in denial about the threat? Haven’t these slumberers shown that they _won’t_ wake up until dramatic achievements in fault-tolerant QC roust them?
这一观点指出,网络安全领域对量子威胁的忽视,暗示了需要采取更积极的措施来应对这一挑战。
Aren’t many in cybersecurity still in denial about the threat? Haven’t these slumberers shown that they _won’t_ wake up until dramatic achievements in fault-tolerant QC roust them?
这一观点指出,网络安全领域对量子威胁的忽视,暗示了需要采取更积极的措施来应对这一挑战。
Given that reality, isn’t it better that it be done first by mostly US-based companies in the open, than by (let’s say) Chinese or Russian intelligence in secret?
这一观点提出了一个值得深思的问题:在量子计算机可能被用于恶意目的的情况下,是否应该由美国公司公开地首先发展这一技术?
Technically, it isn’t a part of the comparison internally but it is a factor that some users care for.
And if there's a suitable vulnerability, it might be possible to trigger it even without using <iframe>, <img> or <a> element, so it's not worth considering for this issue.